The retained record does not contain a marketing claim that can be scored yet; product facts and open checks follow.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 24, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
UPCitemdb resolves 008346711307 to "SlimFast Protein Shake Chocolate- 20g Protein Meal Replacement Shake Ready to " (SlimFast) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
$2.08 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · observed 2026-07-24T05:26:00.556815+00:00
View on Amazon ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search iHerb ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Target ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
UPCitemdb resolves 008346711307 to "SlimFast Protein Shake Chocolate- 20g Protein Meal Replacement Shake Ready to " (SlimFast) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Our image read produced 12 × 325 g = 3900 g versus net weight 325 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.
Technical check only: the panel’s 25 actives sum to 1,242 mg, which fits inside the ≈325,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Published sources describe how magnesium, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
This record does not currently hold an identity-bound public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 303 on 2026-01-29 to 337 on 2026-07-14 (net +34). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 008346711307.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 24, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.