Marketing check: 1 remains partly or independently unverified.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 24, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Chang & Son Enterprises, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2023-05-05: “Product may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Nature's Wonder P…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingYou can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingGradual growth is more ordinary; a sudden burst deserves a closer look. Neither pattern proves whether individual reviews are genuine.
Written reviews grew from 73 to 106 across 2026-02-15 – 2026-07-19 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~10).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
77 MOONACHIE AVE., MOONACHIE, NEW JERSEY 07074, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
matching UPC/GTIN · observed 2026-07-24T09:33:33.845751+00:00
View on Amazon ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search iHerb ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Target ↗Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
USPTO lists FORD LABORATORIES, INC. (['CORPORATION', 'CORPORATION']) in ['NEW JERSEY, USA', 'DELAWARE, USA'] for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Written reviews grew from 73 to 106 across 2026-02-15 – 2026-07-19 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~10).
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The retained listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Chang & Son Enterprises, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2023-05-05: “Product may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Nature's Wonder Premium Soybean Sprouts 12oz bag (UPC: 815098001347)” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.
The package says distributed by: International Vitamin Corporation, Newport Beach, CA 92660. USPTO names FORD LABORATORIES, INC. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the retained records do not establish the relationship.
This record does not currently hold an identity-bound public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 73 on 2026-02-15 to 106 on 2026-07-19 (net +33). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 012441927914.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 24, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.