The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible
Claimed creatine 6,000.0 mg is 50% of the ≈12,000 mg serving (serving size printed on the packaging (photo-read from listing images)) — within physical limits.
Full record · 014679200616 · back to the summary
AMZXO Creatine Monohydrate Gummies 6g, 120 Count Muscle Builder for Men & Women
Exact product checkedGTIN 00014679200616 · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 6 g creatine monohydrate claim matches the panel
MARKETING6 g — per-serving claim
PANELCreatine Monohydrate 6 g — same amountCreatine Monohydrate 6 g
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 6 g of creatine monohydrate, and the listing-image panel shows 6 g creatine monohydrate 4 gummies (12g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 12 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrates | 3.5g g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 0g g | — | |
| Sodium | 6mg mg | — | |
| Creatine Monohydrate | 6000mg mg | — | the real creatine number |
| Vitamin B12(as Cyanocobalamin) | 25mcg mcg | — |
Mass check · assumptions shown
9.5 g listed contents = 6 g major actives + 3.5 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists GTF TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (limited company (ltd.); Hong Kong) (OTHER) in Hong Kong for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 17 to 43 between March 5 and June 10, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 24, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution3
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The label says 9.5 g of creatine in 4 gummies — but not what tho
A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 9,500 mg — 9.5 g — of creatine in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of them near 10 to 14 grams. If that holds here, creatine would be a high share of the serving’s weight, and that is why we stopped on this number. But we did not weigh these gummies. The 2.5–3.5 gram figure is a general estimate for the format, not a measurement of this product. One published number would settle it: the weight of one gummy, or of a 4-gummy serving. Until then we can’t confirm the 9.5 g and we can’t dispute it. Nothing here says the product is short — only that the label doesn’t let anyone check. Checked July 26, 2026.
Dose is higher than studies used
label claims 6000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (3–5 g/day maintenance across trials (short loading phases use more)). Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, Creatine stability by moisture and temperature (PubMed).
Marketed differently from how it was studied
The listing uses “pre-workout” framing, but published research attributes creatine monohydrate’s effect to studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a dose before a workout. Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, Creatine stability by moisture and temperature (PubMed).
Unresolved public record
What is still missing8
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listing claim matches the label panel
The listing claims 6 g; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Creatine Monohydrate at 6 g per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Cost to reach a studied dose
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (3000–5000 mg), this product runs roughly $26 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Gummy format note (applies to creatine gummies as a category)
Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 16 on 2026-02-05 to 43 on 2026-06-10 (net +27). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: 6 g of the 6 g headline is creatine. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
2
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 014679200616.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…certified facility with rigorous testing for purity and potency. We stand behind our product with 100% custo…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…covery GLUTEN FREE SUGAR FREE VEGAN FRIENDLY GMP CERTIFICATE SOY FREE NON GMO FREE” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…Men & Women, Pre-Workout Supplement, Energy Boost Chewable, Vegetarian, Raspberry Flavor PURE…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label claims 6000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (3–5 g/day maintenance across trials (short loading phases use more)). |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Creatine Monohydrate | shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–5 g) · bar = this label | 6 g — above the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 014679200616 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | AMZXO |
| Source listing identifier | B0DJVVRPQB |
| Retailer listing title | AMZXO Creatine Monohydrate Gummies 6g, 120 Count Muscle Builder for Me… show full titleAMZXO Creatine Monohydrate Gummies 6g, 120 Count Muscle Builder for Men & Women, Pre-Workout Supplement, Energy Boost Chewable, Vegetarian, Raspberry Flavor |
| USPTO brand owner | GTF TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (limited company (ltd.); Hong Kong) · OTHER · Hong Kong |
| Owner filed address | Hong Kong); Room 1318-19, Hollywood Plaza,, 610 Nathan Road, Mongkok,, Kowloon, 999077, HONG KONG |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 4 Gummies (12g) |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 120 GUMMIES |
| Badges printed on pack | GLUTEN FREE, SUGAR FREE, VEGAN FRIENDLY, GMP CERTIFICATE, SOY FREE, NON GMO FREE |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 12 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrates | 3.5g g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 0g g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 6mg mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Creatine Monohydrate | 6000mg mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12(as Cyanocobalamin) | 25mcg mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“120” · “GUMMIES” · “BOOST STRENGTH” · “MUSCLE GROWTH” · “BOOSTS STRENGTH” · “RASPBERRY FLAVOR” · “BOOST CONFIDENCE” · “Higher intensity”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $26.39 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — creatine monohydrate · Grade A
- Evidence: Human RCT meta-analyses (5+ indexed in PubMed for strength outcomes; ISSN position stand). PMID 40265319 · PMID 37144634 · PMID 39545789
- Studied serving: 3–5 g/day maintenance (≈0.03 g/kg); optional loading 20 g/day split ×4 for 5–7 days.
- This label claims 6,000.0 mg/serving — outside the studied 3–5 g/day range, if actually present (see verdict above).
- Absorption: Creatine monohydrate is ~99% orally bioavailable when delivered intact — absorption is not the limiting factor; delivery-medium stability is.
- Delivery medium: Creatine is stable as a DRY powder but hydrolyzes toward creatinine (inactive) in warm, moist, or acidic media. A gummy is an aqueous, often acidic matrix — the documented reason independent testing finds many creatine gummies far below label.
- Kidney disease: consult a clinician before use.; Pregnancy/lactation: safety not established at supplemental doses.; Combine with adequate hydration.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Creatine — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (4,996) · studied 3-5 g/day; no UL
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
creatine monohydrate — NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet · Creatine stability by moisture and temperature (PubMed) · ISSN position stand on creatine (PubMed) · PubMed search: creatine monohydrate supplementation · WebMD: creatine · ClinicalTrials.gov — 2,506 registered studies
ℹ Dosage: label claims 6000 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (3–5 g/day maintenance across trials (short loading phases use more)).
ℹ Use pattern in research: studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a dose before a workout.
⚠ Consistency note: the listing markets “pre-workout” framing, but published research attributes this ingredient's effect to sustained daily use — the marketing frame and the research mechanism don't line up.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 014679200616 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai