Full record · 018788103080 · back to the summary
REDMOND Re-Lyte Electrolyte Powder, No Added Sugar (Watermelon Lime)
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
What the label discloses
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 4 declared rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 | — | |
| Total Fat | 0 g | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 0 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 0 g | — | |
| Calcium | — | — | |
| Magnesium | — | — | |
| Chloride | — | — | |
| Sodium | — | — | |
| Potassium | — | — | |
| Coconut Water Powder | — | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those declared amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Panel carries documented template or translation artifacts
The panel carries these quoted observations: “Calories has no unit”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.
No data yet: Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation
Our image read produced 60 × 3 g = 180 g versus net weight 380 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how magnesium have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
Public label filing not retained
This record does not currently hold an identity-bound public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
Recall search: no match found (as of Jul 23, 2026)
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity
Open Food Facts resolves 018788103080 to "Electrolyte mix" (Re-Lyte), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 476 on 2026-01-25 to 590 on 2026-07-20 (net +114). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| magnesium | Studies typically use 200 mg–420 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- magnesium — daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 018788103080 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | REDMOND |
| Source listing identifier | B08QV7Q6QX |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 level scoop |
| Servings per container | 60 |
| Net weight | Net Wt. 13.40 oz. (380g) |
| Badges printed on pack | INFORMED CHOICE, GMO-free |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Magnesium | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Chloride | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Potassium | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Coconut Water Powder | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“ZERO CALORIES” · “PERFECT FOR: HYDRATION REJUVENATION ENDURANCE” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “sugar-free blend of essential electrolytes” · “hydrate better, so you feel better.” · “Not a significant source of Saturated Fat, Trans Fat, Cholesterol, Dietary Fiber, Added Sugars, Vitamin D, and Iron.” · “CHOOSE YOUR SALTY” · “SALTIER”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
A brand storefront was found, but no exact-product price was published or identity-bound at build time.
Brand store redmond.com: 103 supplement products (+44 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Magnesium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
magnesium — NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 018788103080 · built July 23, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai