Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record
Label #210254 “Pro-B Probiotic” (RepHresh), entered 2019-12-22, with the full Supplement Facts on file. Company on file: Distributor — Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Ewing, NJ.
Full record · 022600001126 · back to the summary
RepHresh Pro-B Vaginal Probiotic Supplement, pH Balance
Exact product checkedGTIN 00022600001126 · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
1listed rows
0separately quantified
1combined blend totals
The nih dsld label publishes 0 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Probiotic Blend | 1 Gram(s) | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
NIH DSLD label #210254 (public label filing for this exact product) Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out4
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Lil' Drug Store Products, Inc. (CORPORATION) in IOWA, USA; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 022600001126 to "RepHresh Pro-B" (RepHresh) — consistent with this listing.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 3,310 to 3,326 between January 31 and July 22, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 8, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing4
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Panel amounts are awaiting a clearer image read
The current image extraction saved 1 ingredient name(s) but no usable amounts. This is a LookCloser processing gap, not evidence that the brand withheld the numbers; dose arithmetic is withheld until the panel is re-read.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 3,308 on 2026-01-28 to 3,326 on 2026-07-22 (net +18). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
2
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 022600001126.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…d specifically for women 5 Billion CFUs With Clinically Tested Strains: Each daily capsule contains 5 billi…” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Professional-endorsement claim “…ort New Look! 30-Day Supply #1 TRUSTED BRAND DOCTOR RECOMMENDED+ BALANCES YEAST & BACTERIA TO MAINTAIN FEMIN…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Benefit claim “…minine Health, Daily Oral Capsules, 30 Count Supports Feminine Vaginal Health: Helps balance vagin…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD)✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Supplement Facts visible in photos — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 022600001126 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Rephresh |
| Source listing identifier | B001FOPQQS |
| Retailer listing title | RepHresh Pro-B Vaginal Probiotic Supplement, pH Balance, Probiotics fo… show full titleRepHresh Pro-B Vaginal Probiotic Supplement, pH Balance, Probiotics for Women, Balances Yeast and Bacteria to Maintain Feminine Health, Daily Oral Capsules, 30 Count |
| USPTO brand owner | Lil' Drug Store Products, Inc. · CORPORATION · IOWA, USA; DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | P.O. Box 1883, Cedar Rapids, IOWA 52406, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Pack statement | 30 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | #1 TRUSTED BRAND, GYNECOLOGIST RECOMMENDED, #1 TRUSTED BRAND DOCTOR RECOMMENDED, DOCTOR RECOMMENDED |
No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.
Claims printed on the packaging:
“New Look!” · “30-Day Supply” · “#1 TRUSTED BRAND” · “DOCTOR RECOMMENDED+” · “BALANCES YEAST & BACTERIA TO MAINTAIN FEMININE HEALTH*” · “STARTS TO WORK IN 7 DAYS” · “24/7 PROTECTION^” · “Clinically Shown to Balance Yeast and Bacteria*”
Read by a vision model from 4 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Supplement Facts — NIH DSLD registry
serving: 1 Capsule(s) · contents: 30 Capsule(s) · label #210254 at dsld.od.nih.gov
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| Proprietary Probiotic Blend | 1 Gram(s) |
mcg = 1/1,000 of a mg. As filed in the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database — the authoritative digitization of the printed label. Label versions can lag reformulations.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $20.62 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: www.rephresh.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Probiotic — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (25,361) · strain-specific; label CFU at-manufacture vs at-expiry differ
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record 022600001126 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai