lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 023249090090 · back to the summary

Sports Research® Daily Probiotics 60 Billion CFU w/Prebiotics

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built September 03, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00023249090090 · checked 2026-07-23

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

2listed rows
2separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 2 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Daily Probiotic Blend Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum285 mg (60 Billion CFU) †
Fiber Inulin Blend Organic Acacia Senegal Gum, Organic Apple Fiber (Mallus pumila) Pomace, Organic Inulin (from Jerusalem Artichoke [tuber] and Agave)60 mg †

vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Sports Research Corporation (CORPORATION) in CALIFORNIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 023249090090 to "Daily Probiotics Delayed Release 60 Billion CFU" (Sports Research) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

No individual ingredient amount is published — every figure is a

Every amount on this panel is a blend total: Daily Probiotic Blend Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum; Fiber Inulin Blend Organic Acacia Senegal Gum, Organic Apple Fiber (Mallus pumila) Pomace, Organic Inulin (from Jerusalem Artichoke [tuber] and Agave). A blend total tells you the combined weight of several ingredients, not how much of any one of them you are getting — the amounts could be split in any proportion. Manufacturers are allowed to label this way. It means the individual doses are not public, so nobody outside the company can check them.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing4

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 023249090090.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…Third Party Tested…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Origin claim
“…Manufactured in the USA in cGMP-compliant facilities…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…h a guaranteed 60 billion CFUs per capsule (that’s a lot of good bacteria), and enhanced with 60mg of fiber inulin, this once-daily delayed-release probiotic in a veggie”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Fiber Inulin Blend Organic Acacia Senegal Gu
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label
60 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID023249090090 — via source listing UPC
BrandSports Research
Source listing identifierB08DZ9TL85
Retailer listing titleSports Research® Daily Probiotics 60 Billion CFU w/Prebiotics, 30 Coun…
show full title Sports Research® Daily Probiotics 60 Billion CFU w/Prebiotics, 30 Count
USPTO brand ownerSports Research Corporation · CORPORATION · CALIFORNIA, USA
Owner filed address784 W. Channel St., San Pedro, California 90731, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Veggie Capsule
Servings per container30
Pack statement30 Delayed Release Capsules
Badges printed on packNon-GMO, Vegan, Gluten-Free, Non-GMO Verified, Third Party Tested, cGMP Compliant, NON GMO Project VERIFIED, Certified Vegan

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Daily Probiotic Blend Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus l285 mg (60 Billion CFU) †High
clearly legible in the photo
Fiber Inulin Blend Organic Acacia Senegal Gum, Organic Apple60 mg †High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“60 Billion CFU” · “12 LACTO & BIFIDO PROBIOTIC STRAINS” · “SUPPORTS GUT HEALTH *” · “60 Billion CFU of Probiotics Per Serving” · “Delayed Release Veggie Capsule” · “Formulated with 12 Probiotic Strains & Fiber Inulin” · “Take 1 veggie capsule daily.” · “Living well starts with supplementing well.”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.

Official brand domain: www.sportsresearch.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

ProbioticNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (25,361) · strain-specific; label CFU at-manufacture vs at-expiry differ

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 023249090090 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai