LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 23249092858Sports Research · observed 2026-07-24
Quick read · Sports Research

Sports Research® Hydrate Electrolytes Passion…

The retained record does not contain a marketing claim that can be scored yet; product facts and open checks follow.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 24, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

Quick read · 3 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationIs the label honest?

Panel carries documented template or translation artifacts

Template, translation, or duplicate-row artifacts are reasons to trust the printed numbers less until the brand supplies a clean, product-specific panel.

Evidence and sources

The panel carries these quoted observations: “Calories has no unit”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outIs the label honest?

Every declared ingredient has an amount · 17 quantified rows.

You can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outWho is behind it?

The barcode identity checks out · 023249092858.

The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.

Evidence and sources

Open Food Facts resolves 023249092858 to "Hydrate Passion Fruit" (Sports Research) — consistent with this listing.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 1
  • No identity-bound public label filing is retained in this record.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.

Dose vs research

0.2 g declared

The panel declares 0.2 g per serving, in the 200–420 mg/day context cited in the research.

Comparison, not a safety verdict
NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet ↗PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation ↗NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet ↗PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial ↗
Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$39.95

$0.44 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · observed 2026-07-24T07:26:40.124229+00:00

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing retained

Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing retained

Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing retained

Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out02

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

✓

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed
✓

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 023249092858 to "Hydrate Passion Fruit" (Sports Research) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution01

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Panel carries documented template or translation artifacts

The panel carries these quoted observations: “Calories has no unit”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing06

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

…

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 14 actives sum to 1,012 mg, which fits inside the ≈5,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data
…

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

90 servings × 5 g = 450 g, matching the printed net weight 450 g (Net Wt. 15.870Z (450G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data
…

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data
…

Public label filing not retained

This record does not currently hold an identity-bound public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data
…

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data
…

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 18 on 2026-02-20 to 41 on 2026-07-19 (net +23). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: the 0.2 g listing number equals Niacin (as niacinamide) 16 mg + Potassium (as potassium citrate) 200 mg. What lot-specific document confirms those declared amounts?

The panel resolves what the headline number includes. The remaining question is whether the product in hand matches those declared amounts; ask for a lot-specific certificate of analysis.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 023249092858.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 24, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.