Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Vitafusion Adult Gummy Vitamins for Women
Marketing check: 1 remains partly or independently unverified.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 24, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
Does the marketing hold up?
Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.
◐Partly confirmed1
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Registered owner records: Northwest Natural Products, Inc. · Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
Evidence and sources
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Northwest Natural Products, Inc., Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery declared ingredient has an amount · 17 quantified rows.
You can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode identity checks out · 027917001340.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
Open Food Facts resolves 027917001340 to "vitafusion women's rnulti" () — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWritten reviews moved 240 → 477 from 2026-01-29 to 2026-07-24 without one large burst.
Gradual growth is more ordinary; a sudden burst deserves a closer look. Neither pattern proves whether individual reviews are genuine.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews grew from 240 to 477 across 2026-01-29 – 2026-07-24 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~92).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 2
- No identity-bound public label filing is retained in this record.
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
DELAWARE, USA; DELAWARE, USA · Registration 3742301
6350 NE Campus Drive, Vancouver, WASHINGTON 986616877, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements; Vitamins.
DELAWARE, USA; DELAWARE, USA · Registration 4886079
500 Charles Ewing Boulevard, Ewing, New Jersey 08628, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements; vitamins.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.15 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · observed 2026-07-24T10:30:22.559793+00:00
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedSearch results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedSearch results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedSearch results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out03
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 027917001340 to "vitafusion women's rnulti" () — consistent with this listing.
Reviews accumulated gradually
Written reviews grew from 240 to 477 across 2026-01-29 – 2026-07-24 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~92).
Documented concerns
What needs caution00
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing07
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Northwest Natural Products, Inc., Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how boron, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Boron fact sheet, PubMed search: boron supplementation testosterone.
Public label filing not retained
This record does not currently hold an identity-bound public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 240 on 2026-01-29 to 477 on 2026-07-24 (net +237). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 027917001340.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 24, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.