LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 30772032596Align · observed 2026-07-24USPTO returned 2 exact supplement-class owner records · inspect the identity trail
Quick read · Align

Align Dualbiotic

The retained record does not contain a marketing claim that can be scored yet; product facts and open checks follow.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 24, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

90gummies · 45 servings
Quick read · 4 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Public contextWho is behind it?

Registered owner records: The Procter & Gamble Company · The Procter and Gamble Company

The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.

Registry receipt: USPTO · Registrations 3644851, 3172424 ↗
Evidence and sources

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: The Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter and Gamble Company. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outIs the label honest?

Every declared ingredient has an amount · 1 quantified rows.

You can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outWho is behind it?

The barcode identity checks out · 030772032596.

The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.

Evidence and sources

UPCitemdb resolves 030772032596 to "Align DualBiotic Fruit Multi-Symptom Relief Gummies - 90ct" (Align) — consistent with this listing.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outCan you trust the review pattern?

Written reviews moved 297 → 339 from 2026-02-02 to 2026-07-18 without one large burst.

Gradual growth is more ordinary; a sudden burst deserves a closer look. Neither pattern proves whether individual reviews are genuine.

Evidence and sources

Written reviews grew from 297 to 339 across 2026-02-02 – 2026-07-18 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~10).

Keepa exact-listing historydated count history · exact listing
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 2
  • No identity-bound public label filing is retained in this record.
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?

The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records

These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.

🇺🇸The Procter & Gamble Company

OHIO, USA · Registration 3644851

One Procter & Gamble Plaza, Cincinnati, OHIO 45202, UNITED STATES

Goods covered by this record

IC 005: dietary and nutritional supplements.

🇺🇸The Procter and Gamble Company

OHIO, USA · Registration 3172424

One Procter & Gamble Plaza, Cincinnati, OHIO 45202, UNITED STATES

Goods covered by this record

IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements.

This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.

NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) ↗PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial ↗
Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$29.98

$0.67 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · observed 2026-07-24T09:33:33.846735+00:00

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing retained

Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing retained

Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing retained

Search results remain unbound until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out03

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

✓

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed
✓

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

UPCitemdb resolves 030772032596 to "Align DualBiotic Fruit Multi-Symptom Relief Gummies - 90ct" (Align) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed
✓

Reviews accumulated gradually

Written reviews grew from 297 to 339 across 2026-02-02 – 2026-07-18 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~10).

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing06

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

…

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The retained listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data
…

Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: The Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter and Gamble Company. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

No data
…

Public label filing not retained

This record does not currently hold an identity-bound public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data
…

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data
…

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data
…

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 297 on 2026-02-02 to 339 on 2026-07-18 (net +42). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 030772032596.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 24, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.