The retained record does not contain a marketing claim that can be scored yet; product facts and open checks follow.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Open Food Facts resolves 030772144589 to "Fiber + Probiotics" (Meta Mucil) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingA government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Label #331338 “Metamucil Fiber + Probiotics” (Metamucil), entered 2025-04-24, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingIngredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Label #331338 “Metamucil Fiber + Probiotics” (Metamucil), entered 2025-04-24, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH.
Open Food Facts resolves 030772144589 to "Fiber + Probiotics" (Meta Mucil) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the NIH DSLD label (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 318 on 2026-04-14 to 357 on 2026-07-14 (net +39). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 030772144589.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.