LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
The useful read · Metamucil

Metamucil On-The-Go, Daily Psyllium Husk Powder Supplement

USPTO names Procter & Gamble Company, The as the brand owner.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

What this means for you · The useful read

What the public record can establish

USPTO lists Procter & Gamble Company, The (CORPORATION) in OHIO, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this p…

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

7declared rows
7separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 7 declared rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Total Carbohydrate5 g
Dietary Fiber3 g
Soluble Fiber2 g
Potassium30 mg
Sodium5 mg
See 2 more panel rows in the full report →

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Public ownership record
🇺🇸
Procter & Gamble Company, TheCorporation · exact mark owner for METAMUCIL

One Procter & Gamble Plaza, The Procter and Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, UNITED STATES

Registered2006-05-16
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded

Filed address
One Procter & Gamble Plaza, The Procter and Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, UNITED STATES

This is the USPTO owner of the brand wordmark. It tells a shopper who is behind the brand, but does not by itself identify the manufacturer or prove where this product was made.

Review history
/ 5
not shownvisible ratings

Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 650 to 704 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.

Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts

Relevant research · quick links

Read the ingredient evidence directly

These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.

What would settle the biggest open question?

What would resolve: Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation? Evidence that would settle it: additional identity-bound public documentation.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out01

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Procter & Gamble Company, The (CORPORATION) in OHIO, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing07

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation

Our image read produced 44 × 5.8 g = 255.2 g versus net weight 5.95 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.

No data

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 3 actives sum to 2,030 mg, which fits inside the ≈5,800 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

No data

No label filed with NIH's public catalog

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 650 on 2026-01-28 to 704 on 2026-07-08 (net +54). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity

Open Food Facts resolves 037000254454 to "On the go" (brand not supplied), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 037000254454.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.