Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 039442030238 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 9 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol) | 25 mcg | — | |
| Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine HCl) | 10.5 mg | — | |
| Magnesium (as oxide) | 425 mg | — | |
| Zinc (as oxide) | 25 mg | — | |
| (standardized for steroidal saponins) | 1500 mg | — | |
| L-Arginine HCl | 1500 mg | — | |
| Japanese knotweed extract (Polygonum cuspidatum) (root) (resveratrol) | 300 mg | — | |
| L-Carnitine Fumarate | 500 mg | — | |
| Ashwagandha Extract (leaf and/or root) | 500 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
iHerb Supplement Facts (exact UPC/GTIN) Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Universal Protein Supplements Corporation DBA Universal Nutrition, Inc. (CORPORATION) in NEW JERSEY, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
UPCitemdb resolves 039442030238 to "Animal Stak - Natural Hormone Booster with Tribulus Agmapure and Astapure - 21 " (Universal Nutrition) — consistent with this listing.
Written reviews rose from 502 to 552 between August 17, 2025 and August 22, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 23, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the exact retailer panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 500 on 2025-08-09 to 552 on 2026-08-22 (net +52). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Can you send a clear photo of the full Supplement Facts panel?
It’s the one part of the label required to state what’s inside and how much. A seller who won’t show it before purchase is asking for trust the label would have earned.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 039442030238.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…hen 7 days off; Consider stacking with Animal Test or M-Stak for greater gains Made to the Highest Quality & Safety Standards: All of our products are produced in our GM” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…ackable Pill Pack: Take one pack daily for 21 days, then 7 days off; Consider stacking with Animal Test or M-Stak for greater gains Made to the Highest Quality & Safety ” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…The Complete Anabolic Hormone Stack: Developed for athletes who are looking to break through plateaus and personal records, this comprehensive performance support supple” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 039442030238 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Animal |
| Source listing identifier | B000GOX0JI |
| Retailer listing title | Animal Stak – Complete Natural Hormone Booster Supplement with Tribulu… show full titleAnimal Stak – Complete Natural Hormone Booster Supplement with Tribulus – Natural Testosterone Booster for Athletes – Contains Estrogen Blockers – 1 Month Cycle |
| USPTO brand owner | Universal Protein Supplements Corporation DBA Universal Nutrition, Inc. · CORPORATION · NEW JERSEY, USA |
| Owner filed address | 3 Terminal Road, New Brunswick, NEW JERSEY 08901, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Pack statement | 21 Packs |
| Badges printed on pack | 5 UNIQUE COMPLEXES, TESTED IN A 3RD PARTY, PHARMACEUTICAL GRADE LAB |
No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.
Claims printed on the packaging:
“HORMONE BOOSTER” · “ALL-IN-1” · “Supports Power, Stamina & Muscle Growth†” · “Tribulus Terrestris Extract, Maca & Eurycoma Longifolia” · “PILL PACKS” · “21 DAY SUPPLY” · “for muscle recovery” · “for lean muscle build and recovery”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $39.77 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 039442030238 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai