lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 039442033314 · back to the summary

Animal Creatine Chews Tablets - Enhanced Creatine Monohydrate with AstraGin to Improve A…

LOW public verifiability · 2 of 6 trust signals · built July 21, 2026

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

Intake method matches the research

Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (creatine monohydrate, magnesium). For example, creatine monohydrate: studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a dose before a workout. Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, ISSN position stand on creatine (PubMed).

Each ingredient’s amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

UPC independently corroborated

Open Food Facts resolves 039442033314 to "Creatine Chews" (ANIMAL) — consistent with this listing.

No data yet: Testing claimed — documentation not found

The listing claims third-party testing without naming any lab or certifier, so the claim can't be verified as stated.

i

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the photos (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

i

Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

i

Recall search: no match found (as of Jul 21, 2026)

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

i

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 242 on 2026-01-29 to 286 on 2026-07-15 (net +44). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

i

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…ified US facility, with each batch 3rd party lab tested for quality, safety, and potency, so you can…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: a named laboratory, a certificate of analysis, or a certification-registry entry
No named laboratory, no certificate of analysis, and no certification-registry entry matching this product was located.
Manufacturing claim
“…- All Animal supplements are produced in our GMP-certified US facility, with each batch 3rd p…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
Facility-level claims can be accurate and still say nothing about this product’s contents. No registration document was located.
Benefit claim
“…hanced Creatine Monohydrate with AstraGin to Improve Absorption, Sea Salt for Added Pumps, Delici…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Creatine Monohydrate
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–5 g) · bar = this label
5 g — within the studied range
magnesiumStudies typically use 200 mg–420 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID039442033314
BrandAnimal
Source listing identifierB0B4Z5JM25
Retailer listing titleAnimal Creatine Chews Tablets - Enhanced Creatine Monohydrate with Ast…
show full title Animal Creatine Chews Tablets - Enhanced Creatine Monohydrate with AstraGin to Improve Absorption, Sea Salt for Added Pumps, Delicious and Convenient Chewable Tablets - Fruit Punch

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size4 Chewable Tablets
Servings per container30
Pack statement120 CHEWS
Badges printed on packFDA, THIRD PARTY LABORATORY TESTED, USA

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Creatine Monohydrate5g High
clearly legible in the photo
AstraGin™ (Panax notoginseng Extract (root), Astragalus memb25mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Sea Salt25mg High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Muscle Building & Recovery” · “Boosted Cognitive Function” · “Boosted Bicavailability” · “Easy-to digest” · “fast-absorbing” · “delicious creatine chews” · “Boosted Bioavailability” · “BUILD MUSCLE”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Listed ingredients (as stated on the listing)

Other Ingredients: Sugar, Dextrose, Maltodextrin, Stearic Acid, Citric Acid, Magnesium Stearate, Malic Acid, Natural & Artificial Flavor, Artificial Flavor, Beet Root Powder (Color), Sucralose, Acesulfame Potassium.

Ingredient science — creatine monohydrate · Grade A

Ingredient science — NIH references

CreatineNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (4,996) · studied 3-5 g/day; no UL

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

creatine monohydrateNIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet · ISSN position stand on creatine (PubMed) · PubMed search: creatine monohydrate supplementation · WebMD: creatine · ClinicalTrials.gov — 2,506 registered studies

Use pattern in research: studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a dose before a workout.

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 039442033314 · built July 21, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai