“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

NutriRise Ashwagandha Root 1,300 mg
Checked against public sources between July 21 and September 1, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Reviews arrived in a burst, not gradually. The dated series runs from 15,379 written reviews on August 10, 2025 to 10,000 on November 14, 2025. Up to 5,361 written reviews were added within a single ~30-day window — 54% of the total. …
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Organic Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera)(Root) | 1300 mg |
|---|---|
| Organic Black Pepper (Piper nigrum)(Fruit) | 10 mg |
Printed on the package: VEGAN · MADE IN USA · NATURAL INGREDIENTS · 3RD PARTY LAB TESTED · GMP Certified · GLUTEN FREE · 3rd PARTY LAB VERIFIED · ORGANIC INGREDIENTS
We read 2 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed2
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently2
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Reviews went from 15,379 to 10,000 between August 10 and November 14, 2025 — 54% of them arrived in a single month.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
The dated series runs from 15,379 written reviews on August 10, 2025 to 10,000 on November 14, 2025. Up to 5,361 written reviews were added within a single ~30-day window — 54% of the total. Sudden bursts are the usual fingerprint of incentivized or bought reviews; a steady…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingRegistered owner records: NUTRIRISE USA INC. · 8063451 CANADA INC. · FioreWave S.A. (sociedad anonima (sa); URUGUAY)
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
Evidence and sources
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: NUTRIRISE USA INC., 8063451 CANADA INC., FioreWave S.A. (sociedad anonima (sa); URUGUAY), NUTRIRISE INC.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its amount · 2 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode identity checks out · 045924496928.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “NutriRise Ashwagandha Root 1300 MG | Organic Black Pepper Extract | 120 Capsules” (variant: Default Title) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 2
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
The brand has 4 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
WYOMING, USA · Registration 6819311
165 PONCE DE LEON AVE, SUITE 201, SAN JUAN, PR, PUERTO RICO 00917-123, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Vitamins; Dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements.
CANADA · Registration 6117297
78 Blue Whale Blvd, Brampton, Ontario, L6R2R4, CANADA
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Vitamins; Dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements.
URUGUAY; CANADA · Registration 5147968
URUGUAY); 25 de Mayo 444 Esc. 201, Montevideo, 11000, URUGUAY
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements.
CANADA · Registration 7205584
807 Av. Juan Ponce de León, SAN JUAN, PR, Puerto Rico 00907, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Vitamins; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Vitamin supplements; Dietary supplements; Multi-vitamin preparations; Nutritional supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 1.3 g of ashwagandha per serving. Studies we found used 250 mg–600 mg a day, so this sits above that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.33 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 1, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Brand website
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.37 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 21, 2026
View on Brand website ↗iHerb
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $19.95; Brand website was highest at $21.95 — a $2.00 range at check time.
The observed listing and exact brand page repeat 1300 mg. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Does the brand page tell the same story?
The exact brand page is higher by 0.50 points. The brand page publishes 849; the retailer surface shows 56,682. Different systems can collect different review pools, so this is a signal to inspect, not proof that reviews were manipulated.
The brand page did not expose a complete star-by-star breakdown in the captured structured data, so LookCloser cannot test whether lower-star reviews were omitted. Source: exact barcode-bound brand product page · retailer surface · counts do not prove authenticity.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.