Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 047469079260 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 4 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 2 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 2 g | — | |
| Melatonin | 1 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Kids Melatonin Gummies, 1mg” (variant: 140 ct) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: NATROL, INC., Natrol, Inc., Natrol LLC. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how melatonin have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Melatonin, PubMed search: melatonin dose sleep onset.
This recall is not about the product on this page. Natrol, LLC recalled a different product on April 8, 2021. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “Natrol Melatonin 3 mg, Tab 60 White bottle with purple flip-top cap. Fall asleep faster, Stay asleep longer, 100$ Drug Free 1 Tablet 20 minutes before bedtime. Manufactured by N”. FDA recorded the reason as “One lot of ALA 300 mg Cap-50 were labeled at Melatonin 3 mg Tab-60”. Verify at FDA’s recall database.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 175 on 2025-07-31 to 256 on 2026-08-26 (net +81). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Open Food Facts resolves 047469079260 to "Melatonin" (brand not supplied), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 047469079260.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…3rd Party Tested…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Professional-endorsement claim “…#1 Doctor Recommended Sleep Supplement Ingredient…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP CERTIFIED PRACTICES…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Melatonin | shaded = doses used in studies (0.5 mg–5 mg) · bar = this label | 1 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 047469079260 |
| Brand | Natrol |
| Source listing identifier | B0BX7DV92P |
| Retailer listing title | Natrol Kids Melatonin Gummies 1mg, Restful Sleep, 140 Raspberry Gummie… show full titleNatrol Kids Melatonin Gummies 1mg, Restful Sleep, 140 Raspberry Gummies |
| USPTO brand-owner record | NATROL, INC. · CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA · registration 1532608 · 21411 Prairie Street, CHATSWORTH, CALIFORNIA 91311, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Natrol, Inc. · DELAWARE, USA · registration 2906488 · 21411 Prairie Street, Chatsworth, CALIFORNIA 91311, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Natrol LLC · DELAWARE, USA · registration 5643583 · 21411 Prairie Street, Chats, California 91311, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Natrol LLC · Delaware, USA · registration 8235633 · 21411 Prairie Street, Chatsworth, California 91311, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Gummy |
| Servings per container | 140 |
| Pack statement | 140 GUMMIES |
| Badges printed on pack | DRUG FREE, parent tested parent approved, TOP PRODUCT 2026, GMP CERTIFIED PRACTICES, 3rd Party Tested, 100% DRUG FREE, GMP CERTIFIED, Good Manufacturing Practices |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Melatonin | 1 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Fall asleep faster†” · “Wake up rested†” · “Safe and effective for ages 4+” · “Raspberry Flavor with other natural flavors” · “100% Drug-free” · “#1 Doctor Recommended Sleep Supplement Ingredient” · “Naturally produced in our bodies” · “Helps manage sleep and wake cycles”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Listed ingredients (as stated on the listing)
Dietary Ingredients: Melatonin. Other Ingredients: Organic Tapioca Syrup, Organic Cane Sugar, Water, Contains 2 percent or less of (Citric Acid, Coconut Oil, Carnauba Wax, Organic Natural Flavors, Organic Fruit and Vegetable Juice (for color), Pectin, Sodium Citrate).
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Brand store (natrol.com) ↗ | $21.49 variant: 140 ct — matching UPC/GTIN best price |
| Retailer listing ↗ | $22.46 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store natrol.com: 41 supplement products (+9 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Melatonin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,320) · a hormone; not a vitamin/mineral
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
melatonin — NIH NCCIH — Melatonin · PubMed search: melatonin dose sleep onset · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,068 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: taken before bed; timing matters more than size of dose in the research.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 047469079260 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai