Checked against public sources on July 26, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Registered owner records: ConAgra Brands, Inc. · DSM IP Assets B.V. (besloten vennootschap (b.v.); NETHERLANDS). The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Total Carbohydrate | 5 g |
|---|---|
| Dietary Fiber | 3.5 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Incl. Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG | 13 mg |
Printed on the package: GOLD STAR! · Dairy^ · Sugar · Peanuts & Tree Nuts · Soy · No Artificial Dyes · Vegan · Non-GMO
We read 5 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
1 promise needs a closer look.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: ConAgra Brands, Inc., DSM IP Assets B.V. (besloten vennootschap (b.v.); NETHERLANDS). These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Culturelle® Kids Probiotic + Fiber Packets” (variant: 24) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingA government label filing makes the listed formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Label #16238 “Kids! Packets Probiotic” (Culturelle), entered 2012-12-21, with the full Supplement Facts on file. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
NEBRASKA, USA; NETHERLANDS · Registration 2309490
One ConAgra Drive, Omaha, NEBRASKA 68102, UNITED STATES
IC 005: probiotic dietary supplements.
NETHERLANDS · Registration 6887865
NETHERLANDS); HET OVERLOON 1, HEERLEN, 6411TE, NETHERLANDS
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; prebiotic supplements; medical food, namely, prebiotic supplements; dietetic food and substances, namely, human milk oligosaccharides adapted for medical use; dietary supplements for medical use.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 3.5 g of prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–10 g a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 27, 2026
View on Amazon ↗matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on Target ↗matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on Brand website ↗matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 4 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $19.47; iHerb was highest at $27.14 — a $7.67 range at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built July 26, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.