Checked against public sources on July 26, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend. A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Calories | 5 |
|---|---|
| Total Carbohydrate | 1 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Incl. Og Added Sugars | 0% + |
| Sugar Alcohol | <1 g |
| A Proprietary Probiotic Blend | 120 mg |
We read 6 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
1 promise needs a closer look.
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: ConAgra Brands, Inc., DSM IP Assets B.V. (besloten vennootschap (b.v.); NETHERLANDS). These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Culturelle® Women's Wellness Probiotic Chewables” (variant: 30) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
NEBRASKA, USA; NETHERLANDS · Registration 2309490
One ConAgra Drive, Omaha, NEBRASKA 68102, UNITED STATES
IC 005: probiotic dietary supplements.
NETHERLANDS · Registration 6887865
NETHERLANDS); HET OVERLOON 1, HEERLEN, 6411TE, NETHERLANDS
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; prebiotic supplements; medical food, namely, prebiotic supplements; dietetic food and substances, namely, human milk oligosaccharides adapted for medical use; dietary supplements for medical use.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on Brand website ↗matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 27, 2026
View on Amazon ↗matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 3 sellers. Brand website was lowest at $23.99; iHerb was highest at $25.56 — a $1.57 range at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built July 26, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.