Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Futurebiotics Ashwagandha Extra Strength Stress & Mood Support…
Checked against public sources between July 21 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Package and trademark records name different responsible entities. The package says manufactured by: Futurebiotics, Hauppauge, NY 11788. USPTO names Futurebiotics, LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the…
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Ashwagandha herb extract (Withania somnifera) | 150 mg |
|---|---|
| BioPerine® Black pepper seed extract (Piper nigrum) | 5 mg |
Printed on the package: LAB TESTED · GMO FREE · FREE · LAB TESTED GMO FREE · GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE · GMP · GMO-Free
We read 2 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
1 promise needs a closer look.
◐Partly confirmed2
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
△Claimed without support found1
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Marketing language, not scored
Premium Ingredients
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Every ingredient shows its amount · 2 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWe can see 240 of this product’s 972 reviews — the count rose between August 31, 2025 and August 22, 2026. That is too small a slice to say anything about the wider pattern.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 732 to 972 between August 31, 2025 and August 22, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 33, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
70 Commerce Drive, Hauppauge, New York 11788, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 150 mg of ashwagandha per serving. Studies we found used 250 mg–600 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.20 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 1, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.