full reportFull record · 074312004919 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
We did the comparison: the listing claims 600 mg of ksm-66 ashwagandha® extract (withania somnifera) (root), and the listing-image panel shows 600 mg ksm-66 ashwagandha® extract (withania somnifera) (root) 2 tablets. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| KSM-66 Ashwagandha® Extract (Withania somnifera) (root) | 600 mg | — | |
| L-Theanine | 200 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
label claims 600 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (trials mostly use 250–600 mg/day of root extract). Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Written reviews grew from 470 to 486 across 2026-02-03 – 2026-07-16 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~4).
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: NATURE'S BOUNTY, INC., NATURE'S BOUNTY (NY), INC., Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. (société anonyme (sa); SWITZERLAND). These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
The listing claims 600 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows KSM-66 Ashwagandha® Extract (Withania somnifera) (root) at 600 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (250–600 mg), this product runs roughly $12 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Published sources describe how ashwagandha have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 469 on 2026-02-02 to 486 on 2026-07-16 (net +17). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 074312004919.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…KSM-66 per serving; Ashwagandha KSM-66 is a clinically studied herbal extract that supports a healthy respo…” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Benefit claim “…ress Relief Ashwagandha KSM 66 Tablets, Mood Support, 50 Count PLANT-BASED STRESS RELIEF: Unlike…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label claims 600 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (trials mostly use 250–600 mg/day of root extract). |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| KSM-66 Ashwagandha® Extract (Withania somnif | shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label | 600 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 074312004919 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Nature's Bounty |
| Source listing identifier | B07PWMXMZ6 |
| Retailer listing title | Nature's Bounty Stress Relief Ashwagandha KSM 66 Tablets, Mood Support… show full titleNature's Bounty Stress Relief Ashwagandha KSM 66 Tablets, Mood Support, 50 Count |
| USPTO brand-owner record | NATURE'S BOUNTY, INC. · NEW YORK, USA; SWITZERLAND · registration 0963384 · 55 NORTH MALL, PLAINVIEW, NEW YORK 11803, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | NATURE'S BOUNTY (NY), INC. · NEW YORK, USA; SWITZERLAND · registration 5165421 · 2100 SMITHTOWN AVENUE, LEGAL DEPT., RONKONKOMA, NEW YORK 11779, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. (société anonyme (sa); SWITZERLAND) · SWITZERLAND · registration 7583162 · SWITZERLAND); CH-1800 Vevey, SWITZERLAND |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Tablets |
| Servings per container | 25 |
| Pack statement | 50 Tablets |
| Badges printed on pack | Suitable for Vegetarians |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| KSM-66 Ashwagandha® Extract (Withania somnifera) (root) | 600 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| L-Theanine | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Supports Occasional Anxiety & Stress*” · “Clinically Studied Ingredients” · “Clinically Studied Ingredients to Support a Calm, Relaxed Mood*” · “Helps You Manage Everday Stress*” · “It's in your nature to unwind.” · “Supplement a calm, relaxed mood with Nature's Bounty.*” · “Non-GMO” · “No Artificial Color”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $9.88 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store naturesbounty.com: 0 supplement products — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Ashwagandha — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
ashwagandha — NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies
✓ Dosage: label claims 600 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (trials mostly use 250–600 mg/day of root extract).
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 074312004919 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai