lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 074312016301 · back to the summary

Nature's Bounty Optimal Solutions Hair, Skin and Nails Pectin Gummies

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 25, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00074312016301 · checked 2026-07-25

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 2.5 mg biotin claim matches the panel

MARKETING2.5 mg — per-serving claim
PANELBiotin 2.5 mg — same amount
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 2.5 mg of biotin, and the listing-image panel shows 2.5 mg biotin 2 gummies. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories15
Total Carbohydrate4 g
Total Sugars3 g
Includes Added Sugars3g
Vitamin C15 mg
Vitamin E6.7 mg
Biotin2,500 mcg
Sodium10 mg
Mass check · assumptions shown
4 g listed contents = 0 g major actives + 4 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record

Label #62846 “Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies With Biotin Strawberry Flavored” (Nature's Bounty Optimal Solutions), entered 2016-07-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version). Company on file: Distributor — Nature's Bounty, Inc., Bohemia, NY, USA.

Confirmed

Reviews accumulated gradually

Written reviews grew from 382 to 430 across 2026-02-14 – 2026-07-19 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~144).

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Listed contents barely fit the format’s physics

Listed contents total at least 4 g per 4-gummy serving: 0 g of major actives plus 4 g carbohydrate. A typical pectin gummy is assumed here to weigh 2.5–3.5 g, making a 4-gummy serving roughly 10–14 g. The panel does not state serving weight, so this remains a warning: the listed contents barely fit the format’s physics. The 2.5–3.5 g gummy assumption is not a measurement.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing5

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listing claim matches the label panel

The listing claims 2.5 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Biotin at 2.5 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 378 on 2026-01-31 to 430 on 2026-07-19 (net +52). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 074312016301.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Benefit claim
“…biotin per serving; a vital nutrient to help support beautiful hair; glowing skin; healthy nails…”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 5 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD)✓ Brand's own store found· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID074312016301 — via source listing UPC
BrandNature's Bounty Optimal Solutions
Source listing identifierB0DJG2BHNJ
Retailer listing titleNature's Bounty Optimal Solutions Hair, Skin and Nails Pectin Gummies,…
show full title Nature's Bounty Optimal Solutions Hair, Skin and Nails Pectin Gummies, 2500 mcg Biotin Per Serving, No Stick Gummy, Vegetarian Formula, Strawberry Flavor, 200 count, 100 Total Servings

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size2 Gummies
Servings per container100
Pack statement200 GUMMIES
Badges printed on packNON-GMO

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories15 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate4 g High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars3 g High
clearly legible in the photo
Includes Added Sugars3g High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C15 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E6.7 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Biotin2,500 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium10 mg High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“#1 BRAND FOR HAIR, SKIN & NAILS” · “OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS” · “GREAT TASTING” · “VEGETARIAN FORMULA” · “Antioxidant Vitamins C & E” · “Made with Fruit Pectin” · “STRAWBERRY FLAVORED” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Supplement Facts — NIH DSLD registry

serving: 2 Gummie(s) · contents: 40 Gummie(s) · label #62846 at dsld.od.nih.gov

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories15 Calorie(s)
Total Carbohydrates4 Gram(s)
Vitamin C15 mg
Vitamin E15 IU
Biotin2500 mcg

mcg = 1/1,000 of a mg. As filed in the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database — the authoritative digitization of the printed label. Label versions can lag reformulations.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$18.68 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

BiotinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Record 074312016301 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai