Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
The useful read · Nature's Bounty
Cranberry Concentrate w/ Vitamin C by Nature's Bounty
The panel publishes 3 amounts, led by Cranberry Concentrate (Vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 Concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg Fresh Cranberries) 504 mg.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
What this means for you · The useful read
What the public record can establish
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Panel, decoded
The 504 mg cranberry concentrate (vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg fresh cranberries) claim matches the panel
MARKETING504 mg — per-serving claim
PANELCranberry Concentrate (Vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 Concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg Fresh Cranberries) 504 mg — same amountCranberry Concentrate (Vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 Concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg Fresh Cranberries) 504 mg
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 504 mg of cranberry concentrate (vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg fresh cranberries), and the listing-image panel shows 504 mg cranberry concentrate (vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg fresh cranberries) 2 softgels. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid) | 40 mg | — | |
| Vitamin E (as dl-Alpha Tocopheryl Acetate) | 2 mg | — | |
| Cranberry Concentrate (Vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 Concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg Fresh Cranberries) | 504 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Public ownership records
The brand has 3 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
🇺🇸NATURE'S BOUNTY, INC.
NEW YORK, USA; SWITZERLAND · Registration 0963384
55 NORTH MALL, PLAINVIEW, NEW YORK 11803, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
US 018: FOOD SUPPLEMENT CONTAINING VITAMINS AND MINERALS.; US 046: CONCENTRATED PROTEIN FOOD.
🇺🇸NATURE'S BOUNTY (NY), INC.
NEW YORK, USA; SWITZERLAND · Registration 5165421
2100 SMITHTOWN AVENUE, LEGAL DEPT., RONKONKOMA, NEW YORK 11779, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; Food supplements; Herbal supplements; Probiotic supplements; Vitamin and mineral supplements.
🇨🇭Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. (société anonyme (sa); SWITZERLAND)
SWITZERLAND · Registration 7583162
SWITZERLAND); CH-1800 Vevey, SWITZERLAND
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Vitamins; dietary supplements; mineral supplements; nutritional supplements; vitamin preparations; concentrated protein dietary supplements; plant-based dietary supplements; dietetic supplements adapted for medical use; food supplements; probiotic supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product.
Review history
–/ 5
not shownvisible ratings
Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 318 to 323 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.
Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts
What would settle the biggest open question?
What would resolve: Listing and photo-read panel need confirmation? Evidence that would settle it: identity-bound Supplement Facts panel.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out01
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution00
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing06
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listing and photo-read panel need confirmation
The listing says 504 mg, while our photo read produced Cranberry Concentrate (Vaccinium macrocarpon) (fruit) **(a 50:1 Concentrate, equivalent to 25,200 mg Fresh Cranberries) at 25.2 g per serving. OCR can confuse small units and digits, so this remains unresolved until checked against the physical label.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: NATURE'S BOUNTY, INC., NATURE'S BOUNTY (NY), INC., Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. (société anonyme (sa); SWITZERLAND). These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 318 on 2026-01-29 to 323 on 2026-07-21 (net +5). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity
Open Food Facts resolves 074312137945 to "Cranberry" (brand not supplied), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: 0.504 g of the 0.504 g headline is cranberry. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 074312137945.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.