Specific fact confirmed
UPC independently corroborated
Open Food Facts resolves 074312785641 to "" (Nature's Bounty) — consistent with this listing.
Why this record matters · Nature's Bounty
Nature's Bounty Optimal Solutions Hair
Declared contents barely fit the format’s physics
Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
What this means for you · Why this record matters
How the headline number breaks down
Declared contents total at least 3.1 g per 4-gummy serving: 0.1 g of major actives plus 3 g carbohydrate. A typical pectin gummy is assumed here to weigh 2.5–3.5 g, making a 4-gummy serving roughly 10–14 g. The…
Panel, decoded
The 2.5 mg biotin claim matches the panel
MARKETING2.5 mg — per-serving claim
PANELBiotin 2.5 mg — same amountCollagen 100 mg
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 2.5 mg of biotin, and the listing-image panel shows 2.5 mg biotin 2 gummies. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biotin | 2,500 mcg | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 3 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 2 g | — | |
| Includes Added Sugars | 2g | — | |
| Collagen | 100 mg | — |
Mass check · assumptions shown
3.1 g declared contents = 0.1 g major actives + 3 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Dose vs research
0.0025 g declared
The panel declares 0.0025 g per serving, in the 2.5–15 g/day context cited in the research.
Comparison, not a safety verdict
Public ownership records
The brand has 3 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
🇺🇸NATURE'S BOUNTY, INC.
NEW YORK, USA; SWITZERLAND · Registration 0963384
55 NORTH MALL, PLAINVIEW, NEW YORK 11803, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
US 018: FOOD SUPPLEMENT CONTAINING VITAMINS AND MINERALS.; US 046: CONCENTRATED PROTEIN FOOD.
🇺🇸NATURE'S BOUNTY (NY), INC.
NEW YORK, USA; SWITZERLAND · Registration 5165421
2100 SMITHTOWN AVENUE, LEGAL DEPT., RONKONKOMA, NEW YORK 11779, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements; Food supplements; Herbal supplements; Probiotic supplements; Vitamin and mineral supplements.
🇨🇭Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. (société anonyme (sa); SWITZERLAND)
SWITZERLAND · Registration 7583162
SWITZERLAND); CH-1800 Vevey, SWITZERLAND
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Vitamins; dietary supplements; mineral supplements; nutritional supplements; vitamin preparations; concentrated protein dietary supplements; plant-based dietary supplements; dietetic supplements adapted for medical use; food supplements; probiotic supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product.
Review history
–/ 5
not shownvisible ratings
Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 3,273 to 3,454 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality.
Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity
Relevant research · quick links
Read the ingredient evidence directly
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
What would settle the biggest open question?
Which exact USPTO registrant is tied to this product's brand use? Evidence that would settle it: exact-wordmark ownership record.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out01
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 074312785641 to "" (Nature's Bounty) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Declared contents barely fit the format’s physics
Declared contents total at least 3.1 g per 4-gummy serving: 0.1 g of major actives plus 3 g carbohydrate. A typical pectin gummy is assumed here to weigh 2.5–3.5 g, making a 4-gummy serving roughly 10–14 g. The panel does not state serving weight, so this remains a warning: the declared contents barely fit the format’s physics. The 2.5–3.5 g gummy assumption is not a measurement.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: NATURE'S BOUNTY, INC., NATURE'S BOUNTY (NY), INC., Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. (société anonyme (sa); SWITZERLAND). These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Listing claim matches the label panel
The listing claims 2.5 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Biotin at 2.5 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 3,273 on 2026-01-29 to 3,454 on 2026-07-06 (net +181). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 074312785641.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.