Checked against public sources on July 26, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Category context: sexual-enhancement products carry documented FDA risk. This is category history, not proof about this product, but it changes how much unsupported claims deserve to be trusted.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Total Carbohydrate | <1 g |
|---|---|
| Zinc (Zinc Citrate) | 11 mg |
| Grape (Vitis vinifera) (skin extract) | 300 mg |
| Diindolylmethane (DIM) | 200 mg |
| Calcium D-Glucarate | 100 mg |
| Quercetin (Quercetin Dihydrate) | 100 mg |
| Nettle (Urtica dioica) (root extract) | 100 mg |
Printed on the package: LAB VERIFIED · VEGAN · GLUTEN FREE · 100% PCR BOTTLES · GMP CERTIFIED · UTAH MADE · CERTIFIED
We read 7 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
1 promise needs a closer look.
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
This is category history, not proof about this product, but it changes how much unsupported claims deserve to be trusted.
FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. …
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.
11 mg per serving — within the 8–40 mg/day used in the linked studies.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 11 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$0.85 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 27, 2026
View on Amazon ↗$0.85 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers at the same price at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built July 26, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.