Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 076314601455 · back to the summary
Emergen-C Vitamin C 750mg Immune Support Gummies
Exact product checkedGTIN 00076314601455 · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 750 mg vitamin c (as ascorbic acid) claim matches the panel
MARKETING750 mg — listing title
PANELVitamin C (as ascorbic acid) 750 mg — same amount
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 750 mg of vitamin c (as ascorbic acid), and the listing-image panel shows 750 mg vitamin c (as ascorbic acid) 3 gummies. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 45 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 11 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 7 g | — | |
| Vitamin C (as ascorbic acid) | 750 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxine hydrochloride) | 1.5 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B12 (as cyanocobalamin) | 4 mcg | — | |
| Biotin | 36 mcg | — | |
| Zinc (as zinc sulfate) | 1.5 mg | — | |
| Manganese (as manganese gluconate) | 0.38 mg | — | |
| Sodium | 35 mg | — |
Mass check · assumptions shown
11 g listed contents = 0 g major actives + 11 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out4
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Alacer Corporation (CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 076314601455 to "Immune Support Gummies" (Emergen-C) — consistent with this listing.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 733 to 786 between February 12 and July 21, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 24, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Listed contents barely fit the format’s physics
Listed contents total at least 11 g per 4-gummy serving: 0 g of major actives plus 11 g carbohydrate. A typical pectin gummy is assumed here to weigh 2.5–3.5 g, making a 4-gummy serving roughly 10–14 g. The panel does not state serving weight, so this remains a warning: the listed contents barely fit the format’s physics. The 2.5–3.5 g gummy assumption is not a measurement.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 731 on 2026-01-29 to 786 on 2026-07-21 (net +55). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 076314601455.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “Emergen-C Vitamin C 750mg Immune Support Gummies, Mixed Fruit, 45 Gummies Includes on…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Zinc (as zinc sulfate) | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 1.5 mg — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- zinc — daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 076314601455 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Emergen-C |
| Source listing identifier | B06XBXZXV5 |
| Retailer listing title | Emergen-C Vitamin C 750mg Immune Support Gummies, Mixed Fruit, 45 Gumm… show full titleEmergen-C Vitamin C 750mg Immune Support Gummies, Mixed Fruit, 45 Gummies |
| USPTO brand owner | Alacer Corporation · CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 219 Allen Rd, Carlisle, PENNSYLVANIA 17013, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 3 Gummies |
| Servings per container | 15 |
| Net weight | NET WT. 6.1 OZ (176 g) |
| Pack statement | 36-0.17, OZ (4.9 g) PACKETS |
| Badges printed on pack | Zinc |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 45 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 11 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 7 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C (as ascorbic acid) | 750 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxine hydrochloride) | 1.5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 (as cyanocobalamin) | 4 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Biotin | 36 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc (as zinc sulfate) | 1.5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Manganese (as manganese gluconate) | 0.38 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 35 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Immune Support” · “Enhance Energy with B Vitamins*” · “Natural Fruit Flavors” · “Gluten-Free” · “Vegetarian” · “Caffeine-Free” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “SO MUCH MORE”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $12.98 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: www.emergenc.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Biotin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Manganese — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,608) · UL 11 mg (adults)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 076314601455 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai