lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 088395017155 · back to the summary

Carlson - Elite Omega-3 Gems, 1600 mg Omega-3 Fatty Acids Including EPA and DHA

4 concrete dimensions confirmed · 1 still open · built July 26, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00088395017155 · checked 2026-07-26

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 1.6 g total omega-3 fatty acids claim matches the panel

MARKETING1.6 g — listing title
PANELTotal Omega-3 Fatty Acids 1.6 g — same amountNorwegian Fish Oil 2.5 g + Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids 1.6 g + EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid) 800 mg + DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid) 600 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 1.6 g of total omega-3 fatty acids, and the listing-image panel shows 1.6 g total omega-3 fatty acids 2 soft gels. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories30
Total Fat2.5 g
Cholesterol<5 mg
Protein<1 g
Vitamin E (as d-alpha tocopherol)13.4 mg
Norwegian Fish Oil2.5 g
Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids1,600 mg
EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid)800 mg
DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid)600 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

EPA + DHA dose is within one studied range

The panel lists 1,400 mg EPA + DHA per serving (2 Soft Gels). One randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day; omega-3 studies vary widely. This is research context, not a recommendation or safety verdict.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists J.R. Carlson Laboratories, Inc. (CORPORATION) in ILLINOIS, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Panel arithmetic needs confirmation

The listing-image panel produced 5,513 mg across 5 actives for an ≈2,500 mg serving. That cannot be reconciled; the physical label or another exact filed document must settle it.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how omega-3 have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet, PubMed dose-response trial.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says distributed by: Carlson Division of J.R. Carlson Laboratories, Inc., Lincolnshire, IL 60069 USA. USPTO names J.R. Carlson Laboratories, Inc. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 253 on 2026-02-02 to 285 on 2026-07-15 (net +32). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 088395017155.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Benefit claim
“…ega 3 Fish Oil Capsules, Lemon, 130 Softgels Promotes whole body health and wellness 1,600 mg of o…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Norwegian Fish Oil
shaded = doses used in studies (300 mg–1.8 g) · bar = this label
2.5 g — above the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID088395017155 — via source listing UPC
BrandCarlson
Source listing identifierB081VWWGCZ
Retailer listing titleCarlson - Elite Omega-3 Gems, 1600 mg Omega-3 Fatty Acids Including EP…
show full title Carlson - Elite Omega-3 Gems, 1600 mg Omega-3 Fatty Acids Including EPA and DHA, Norwegian, Wild-Caught Fish Oil Supplement, Sustainably Sourced Omega 3 Fish Oil Capsules, Lemon, 130 Softgels
USPTO brand ownerJ.R. Carlson Laboratories, Inc. · CORPORATION · ILLINOIS, USA
Owner filed address600 W. University Drive, Arlington Heights, ILLINOIS 60074, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size2 Soft Gels
Servings per container65
Badges printed on packNON-GMO TESTED, IFOS, REDUCED PLASTIC IMPACT

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories30 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat2.5 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Cholesterol<5 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein<1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E (as d-alpha tocopherol)13.4 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Norwegian Fish Oil2.5 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids1,600 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid)800 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid)600 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Wild Caught” · “44% More FREE” · “Freshness Purity Guaranteed & Potency” · “Natural Lemon Flavor” · “Healthy Heart*” · “Brain Function*” · “Vision Health*” · “Providing the finest Norwegian omeg”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$42.42 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

Omega-3NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (14,320) · FDA: <5 g/day EPA+DHA from supplements

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

omega-3 (EPA + DHA)NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet · PubMed dose-response trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 684 registered studies

Use pattern in research: research measures EPA and DHA together, not the weight of the fish-oil concentrate; the panel must expose those rows separately.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 088395017155 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai