No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.

Carlson Vitamin D3 5,000 IU (125 mcg)
Checked against public sources between July 23 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Package and trademark records name different responsible entities. The package says distributed by: Carson, Lincolnshire, IL 60. USPTO names J.R. Carlson Laboratories, Inc. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship…
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Vitamin D | 125 mcg |
|---|---|
| (as cholecalciferol) | 5,000 IU |
Printed on the package: NON-GMO · TESTED · FRESHNESS · PURITY GUARANTEED · POTENCY · REDUCED IMPACT COLLECTIVE · PLASTIC IMPAC · WOMEN OWNED
We read 2 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Marketing language, not scored
SUPERIOR PURITY AND POTENCY
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The barcode identity checks out · 088395141201.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Vitamin D3 5,000 IU (125 mcg)” (variant: 360 Soft Gels) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
600 W. University Drive, Arlington Heights, ILLINOIS 60074, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.09 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 29, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.09 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 24, 2026
View on iHerb ↗Brand website
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.11 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 23, 2026
View on Brand website ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 3 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $33.92; Brand website was highest at $39.90 — a $5.98 range at check time.
The observed listing and exact brand page repeat 125 mcg. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.