Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Amazon Technologies, Inc. (CORPORATION) in NEVADA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · 195515034456 · back to the summary
Amazon Basics Vitamin D3 2000 IU Gummies, Orange
Exact product checkedGTIN 00195515034456 · checked 2026-07-25
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 195515034456 to "Vitamin D3 Gummies" (Amazon Basics) — consistent with this listing.
Reviews accumulated gradually
Written reviews grew from 1475 to 1542 across 2026-02-14 – 2026-07-25 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~21).
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing4
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
Public label filing not saved
This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,464 on 2026-01-31 to 1,542 on 2026-07-25 (net +78). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send a clear photo of the full Supplement Facts panel?
It’s the one part of the label required to state what’s inside and how much. A seller who won’t show it before purchase is asking for trust the label would have earned.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 195515034456.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Supplement Facts visible in photos — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 195515034456 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Amazon Basics |
| Source listing identifier | B07BBNNHRX |
| Retailer listing title | Amazon Basics Vitamin D3 2000 IU Gummies, Orange, Lemon & Strawberry, … show full titleAmazon Basics Vitamin D3 2000 IU Gummies, Orange, Lemon & Strawberry, 160 Count (2 per Serving) (Previously Solimo) |
| USPTO brand owner | Amazon Technologies, Inc. · CORPORATION · NEVADA, USA |
| Owner filed address | Attn: Trademarks, 410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WASHINGTON 98109, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | per serving |
| Pack statement | 160 GUMMIES |
No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Vegetarian” · “Gluten-Free” · “Vegetarian, Gluten-Free”
Read by a vision model from 3 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $7.81 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 195515034456 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai