Checked against public sources between July 25 and September 2, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient. You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Calories | 10 |
|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g |
| Trans Fat | 0 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 130 mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 3 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0 g |
| Total Sugars | 1 g |
| Added Sugars | 1 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Vitamin D | 10 mcg |
| Calcium | 18 mg |
| Iron | 0 mg |
| Potassium | 212 mg |
| Vitamin C | 450 mg |
| Vitamin B6 | 10 mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 2.5 mcg |
| Magnesium | 60 mg |
| Zinc | 10 mg |
Printed on the package: VEGAN · GLUTEN FREE · NON GMO · DAIRY FREE · NO ARTIFICIAL COLORS · SOY FREE · REP.AUT.INAH
We read 20 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
The listing presents 100 mg for elderberry, but vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Open Food Facts resolves 195893630943 to "Hydration immunity" () — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 60 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 10 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$2.00 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.