Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend
A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
Exact product checked · GTIN 197644135691Stonehenge Health · observed 2026-07-23
The useful read · Stonehenge Health
Stonehenge Health Biotics for Women Probiotic 70 Billion…
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
30capsules
30servings per container
NSF/ANSI 173 certification on file (registry-verified)
A named registry entry is stronger evidence than a testing badge or star rating because an outside body can be checked.
The barcode identity checks out · 197644135691.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Shopper scorecard
The useful findings, in decision order.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
Is the label honest?
Who is behind it?
Checks outBarcode / GTIN record
The barcode identity checks out · 197644135691.
UPCitemdb resolves 197644135691 to "Stonehenge Health Probiotics 65 Billion CFU + 24 Strains Prebiotic Synbiotics " (Stonehenge Health) — consistent with this listing.
Why it mattersThe outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Open the source-linked findingAny trouble on the record?
Checks outCertification / laboratory record
NSF/ANSI 173 certification on file (registry-verified)
NSF’s certified-products registry lists “Stonehenge HEALTH® FOR WOMEN MENOPAUSE SUPPORT” under Stonehenge Health LLC. This certification covers identity and quantity of contents plus contaminant limits — not effectiveness. Verified directly against info.nsf.org at build time.
Why it mattersA named registry entry is stronger evidence than a testing badge or star rating because an outside body can be checked.
Open the source-linked findingWill it do what you want?
Public contextNIH / published research
Research links are available for prebiotic fiber.
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized tr…
Why it mattersUse the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Open the source-linked findingWhat remains open 2
- Not yet in NIH's public label registry.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Relevant research · quick links
Read the ingredient evidence directly
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out02
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Certified by NSF — contents and contaminants checked
NSF’s certified-products registry lists “Stonehenge HEALTH® FOR WOMEN MENOPAUSE SUPPORT” under Stonehenge Health LLC. This certification covers identity and quantity of contents plus contaminant limits — not effectiveness. Verified directly against info.nsf.org at build time.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
UPCitemdb resolves 197644135691 to "Stonehenge Health Probiotics 65 Billion CFU + 24 Strains Prebiotic Synbiotics " (Stonehenge Health) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing04
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Review-count history: not available
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
2
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 197644135691.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.
Search “Stonehenge Health LLC” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.
4
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.