“GMP”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00198168381175Natgrown · checked Jul 21, 2026 · on sale since Jan 10, 2020🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Estrella, Miguel · DOMINICAN REPUBLIC; FLORIDA, USAPackage says manufactured for: GSD & Company, Inc. · 125 S. State Road 7, Suite 104-152
West Palm Beach, FL 33414
Quick read · Natgrown
Natgrown Organic Maca Root Powder Capsules
Checked against public sources between July 21 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
120capsules · 60 servings
Does the marketing hold up?
Package and trademark records name different responsible entities. The package says manufactured for: GSD & Company, Inc., 125 S. State Road 7, Suite 104-152 West Palm Beach, FL 33414. USPTO names Estrella, Miguel as the exact wordmark owner. …
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified2 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.33per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Estrella, Miguelindividual; corporation · DOMINICAN REPUBLIC; FLORIDA, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
2◖ partly confirmed1? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Organic Maca Root (Lepidium meyenii) (root) (Black, Red, and Yellow Maca) | 1500 mg |
|---|---|
| Black Pepper Extract (Piper nigrum) (fruit) (Standardized to 95% Piperine) | 5 mg |
Printed on the package: VEGAN · GLUTEN FREE · NON GMO · SOY FREE · LACTOSE FREE · GMP · GMO FREE · DIETARY SUPPLEMENT
We read 2 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed2
“color delivers unique compounds that work together to support energy, mood, and vitality* SUPERFOOD - Maca root is a plant-based superfood that…”
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“IN THE USA - Made with Organic Maca root, harvested by our trusted partners, high in the Peruvian”
Evidence →“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Quick read · 1 useful finding
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
CheckedIs the label honest?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 2 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Estrella, MiguelIndividual; Corporation · exact supplement-class mark for NATGROWN
Filed address
9482 Madewood Ct, Royal Palm Beach, FLORIDA 33411, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Background reading
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 1.5 g of maca root per serving. Studies we found used 1.5 g–3 g a day, so this sits inside that range.
0studied 1.5 g–3 g
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$19.94
$0.33 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.