“Creatine Support] Formulated without sugar to fit into keto, low-carb, and clean”
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00198168434901Etta Vita · checked Aug 15, 2026 · on sale since Apr 12, 2024🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Graystone LLC · MINNESOTA, USA; TEXAS, USA
Quick read · Etta Vita
Sugar-Free Creatine Monohydrate Gummies
Checked against public sources on August 15, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
90gummies · 45 servings
Does the marketing hold up?
Testing claimed — documentation not found. The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. …
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified7 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.67per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Graystone LLClimited liability company · MINNESOTA, USA; TEXAS, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
2◖ partly confirmed2? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Calories | 18 |
|---|---|
| Total Carbohydrates | 3 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Includes 0g Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Sugar Alcohols | 2 g |
| Sodium | 20 mg |
| Creatine monohydrate | 2500 mg |
Printed on the package: VEGAN · NON-GMO · GLUTEN-FREE · SUGAR-FREE · GELATIN-FREE · ARL · 3rd Party Tested · Trusted ISO Lab
We read 7 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed2
“in the USA with Trusted Quality] Manufactured in GMP-certified, FDA-registered facilities right here in the”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently2
“batch is third-party tested to ensure purity, potency, and”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
“in the USA with Trusted Quality] Manufactured in GMP-certified, FDA-registered facilities right here in the”
Evidence →“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Quick read · 3 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationWill you get what you pay for?
Creatine in a gummy can degrade in moist, acidic conditions.
Moist, acidic formats can reduce the active ingredient over time, so the delivered amount may be lower than the label says.
Evidence and sources
Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.
NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheetcreatine monohydrate context · not product evidenceCreatine stability by moisture and temperature (PubMed)creatine monohydrate context · not product evidence
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedIs the label honest?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 7 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedCan you trust the review pattern?
We can see -106 of this product’s 198 reviews — the count fell between July 21, 2025 and August 11, 2026. That is too small a slice to say anything about the wider pattern.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews fell from 304 to 198 between July 21, 2025 and August 11, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 26, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Graystone LLCLimited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for ETTA VITA
Filed address
2045 W Grand Ave Ste B, Chicago, ILLINOIS 60612, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Background reading
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 2.5 g of creatine monohydrate per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–5 g a day, so this sits below that range.
0studied 3 g–5 g
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$29.95
$0.67 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 15, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Brand website
Official product-page candidate · UPC absent$44.99
Official shopping lead; excluded from exact price comparisons.
Sugar-Free Creatine Monohydrate Gummies (5g Per Packet) - Potent Creatine Gummies for Men & Women, Supplement for Muscle Support, Cognitive Function - Non-GMO, Gluten-Free · Default Title. Confirm the package UPC/GTIN before buying.
Check brand website ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
The brand-page price is shown as a shopping lead only. It is excluded from the exact-product price difference because the page does not publish this record's matching UPC/GTIN.
The observed listing and related brand page repeat 5 g. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 15, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.