LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00198168474235Old School Labs · checked Jul 31, 2026 · on sale since Jan 4, 2024🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Cosidla, Inc. · DELAWARE, USAPackage says manufactured by: NutraStar Inc · 700 Central Avenue, Farmingdale, NJ 07727
Quick read · Old School Labs

Old School Labs Creatine for Women with Collagen and…

Checked against public sources on July 31, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

30servings per container

Does the marketing hold up?

How it’s marketed doesn’t match how it was studied. The listing uses “pre-workout” framing, but published research attributes creatine monohydrate’s effect to studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a…

Is the dose real?Listing and panel agreeboth say 2 g of Hydrolyzed Bovine Collagen
What a serving costs$1.00per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Cosidla, Inc.corporation; limited liability company · DELAWARE, USA
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

2◖ partly confirmed2? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 1 Scoop (8 g) · 30 servings per container · Net Wt 243.1g (8.57oz)

Creatine Monohydrate5 g
Hydrolyzed Bovine Collagen2 g
BCAA 2:1:1 Instant1 g

Printed on the package: SUGAR FREE · MADE IN USA · NON GMO · GMP CERTIFIED · GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE · FORMULATED IN CALIFORNIA · Third-Party Lab Tested · GMP

We read 3 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

Partly confirmed2

“School Labs Pride - All our products are formulated in Southern California and made in the USA with the highest GMP standards, certified by…”

“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

Evidence →
“for Women's Fitness Goals - Tailored to meet women’s unique physiological needs, this creatine powder formula supports fitness goals like improved…”

Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

?Couldn’t verify independently2

“Lab”

No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.

Evidence →
“School Labs Pride - All our products are formulated in Southern California and made in the USA with the highest GMP standards, certified by…”

“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.

Evidence →

We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.

Quick read · 2 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 3 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedCan you trust the review pattern?

Reviews rose from 376 to 836 between July 4, 2025 and July 28, 2026 — no sudden jump.

A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.

Evidence and sources

Written reviews rose from 376 to 836 between July 4, 2025 and July 28, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 104, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 3
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
  • Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Cosidla, Inc.Corporation; Limited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for OLD SCHOOL LABS
Registration5320069
Registered2017-10-31
AssignmentsYes

Filed address
Suite 235, 324 S. Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90212, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.

Dose vs research

Collagen

2 g per serving — below the 2.5–15 g/day used in the linked studies.

Linked ingredient research · label amount, not a recommendation
Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 5 g of creatine monohydrate per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–5 g a day, so this sits inside that range.

0studied 3 g–5 g

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

The panel lists 2 g of collagen peptides per serving. Studies we found used 2.5 g–15 g a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 2.5 g–15 g

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$29.99

$1.00 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 31, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built August 02, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.