lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 198168537985 · back to the summary

Mk Supplements Collagen & Colostrum

5 concrete dimensions confirmed · 0 still open · built August 05, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00198168537985 · checked 2026-08-04

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 10 g bovine collagen claim matches the panel

MARKETING10 g — per-serving claim
PANELBovine Collagen 10 g — same amountBovine Collagen 10 g + Bovine Colostrum 3 g
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 10 g of bovine collagen, and the NIH DSLD label shows 10 g bovine collagen 13 gram(s). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories50 Calorie(s)
Total Fat1 Gram(s)
Cholesterol5 mg
Total Carbohydrates1 Gram(s)
Protein10 Gram(s)
Calcium77 mg
Sodium35 mg
Bovine Collagen10 Gram(s)
Bovine Colostrum3 Gram(s)

NIH DSLD label #339219 (public label filing for this exact product) Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out8

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Collagen Peptides dose matches the amounts used in studies

label claims 10000 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides). Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.

Confirmed

The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible

Claimed collagen 10,000.0 mg is 77% of the ≈13,000 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 198168537985) — within physical limits.

Confirmed

Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record

Label #339219 “Grass-Fed Collagen & Colostrum Unflavored” (MK Supplements), entered 2025-09-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file. Company on file: Distributor — MK Supplements LLC, Alpharetta, GA.

Confirmed

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists MK Supplement LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in GEORGIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Found on the brand's own store

The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Collagen & Colostrum” (variant: Unflavored / 30) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 198168537985 to "Grass-fed Collagen & Colostrum" (MK Supplements) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 23 to 34 between July 12, 2025 and August 4, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 5, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing5

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing and the exact brand product page both claim third-party testing. Neither names the laboratory or links a product- or lot-specific report. Repeating the claim across two pages confirms the brand publishes it, not that testing occurred. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 25 on 2025-07-05 to 34 on 2026-08-04 (net +9). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: the 10 g listing number equals Calcium 77 mg + Bovine Collagen 10 g. What lot-specific document confirms those listed amounts?

The panel resolves what the headline number includes. The remaining question is whether the product in hand matches those listed amounts; ask for a lot-specific certificate of analysis.

2

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 198168537985.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…3RD-PARTY TESTED FOR PURITY…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Benefit claim
“…10g COLLAGEN + 3g COLOSTRUM — THE COMBINATION MOST BRANDS SKIP EXPLAINING: Colostrum's growth factors (IGF-1, TGF-β) repair the gut lining and improve nutrient absorptio”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label claims 10000 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides).

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
collagen peptidesStudies typically use 2.5 g–15 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Label math — claimed dose vs. serving mass
Why is this shown?
Simple physics: the claimed dose has to weigh less than the whole serving. We compare the milligrams promised on the label to the weight of one serving, from the label itself. If the claim fits — even at a small percentage, which is normal, since servings include binders and flavoring — the label is at least physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.
claimed collagen 10000 mg77% of serving mass — tiny doses are normal for potent activesserving ≈ 13,000 mg

The claimed collagen dose of 10000 mg fits within the ≈13,000 mg serving — physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.

A low percentage isn’t a red flag — most servings are mostly carrier, binder, and flavoring.

Show the arithmetic
collagen: 10000 mg claimed ÷ 13,000 mg serving mass = 77%. Serving mass source: serving size printed on the packaging (photo-read from listing images). Redo it yourself — that’s the point.

Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD)✓ Brand's own store found· Supplement Facts visible in photos — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID198168537985 — via source listing UPC
BrandMK Supplements
Source listing identifierB0D88YY6R2
Retailer listing titleMK Supplements Grass-Fed Collagen & Colostrum Powder, Unflavored, IgG …
show full title MK Supplements Grass-Fed Collagen & Colostrum Powder, Unflavored, IgG 21%
USPTO brand ownerMK Supplement LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · GEORGIA, USA
Owner filed address2460 Crabapple Road, Suite 202 #120, Alpharetta, GEORGIA 30004, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Net weightNet weight 13.76 oz (390 g)
Pack statement30 DAY SUPPLY
Badges printed on pack3RD-PARTY TESTED FOR PURITY, GRASS-FED, LAB TESTED, IgG 21% Label-Verified

No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.

Claims printed on the packaging:

“GRASS-FED” · “3RD-PARTY TESTED FOR PURITY” · “UNFLAVORED” · “10 g of collagen + 3 g of bovine colostrum per serving” · “30 DAY SUPPLY” · “Collagen + Colostrum. Better Together.” · “MIXES INTO ANYTHING · GRASS-FED · IGG 21%” · “Why These Two Belong Together”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Supplement Facts — NIH DSLD registry

serving: 13 Gram(s) · contents: 13.76 Ounce(s) · label #339219 at dsld.od.nih.gov

IngredientAmount per serving
Calories50 Calorie(s)
Total Fat1 Gram(s)
Cholesterol5 mg
Total Carbohydrates1 Gram(s)
Protein10 Gram(s)
Calcium77 mg
Sodium35 mg
Bovine Collagen10 Gram(s)
Bovine Colostrum3 Gram(s)

mcg = 1/1,000 of a mg. As filed in the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database — the authoritative digitization of the printed label. Label versions can lag reformulations.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$60.00 checked Aug 05, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending
Brand store (mksupplements.com) ↗$81.00 variant: Unflavored / 30 — matching UPC/GTIN

Brand store mksupplements.com: 13 supplement products (+2 merch items) — a single-category catalog.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

collagen peptidesPubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies

Dosage: label claims 10000 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides).

Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 198168537985 · built August 05, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai