full reportFull record · 198168915967 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes 7 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 38.5 kcal | — | |
| Protein | 10 g | — | |
| Vitamin C (as ascorbic acid) | 55 mg | — | |
| Biotin (as d-biotin) | 2, 500 mcg | — | |
| Multi Collagen Complex | 10, 888 mg | — | |
| Hyaluronic Acid (as sodium hyaluronate) | 55 mg | — | |
| Keratin | 50 mg | — | |
| Elastin | 4 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Written reviews rose from 193 to 1,226 between July 30, 2025 and August 25, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 115, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: AMERICAN GENCARE GROUP INC, Xingqiao Chen. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Technical check only: the panel’s 6 actives sum to 1,052 mg, which fits inside the ≈11,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
41 servings × 11 g = 451 g, matching the printed net weight 454 g (NET WT 1 lb (16 oz)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 194 on 2025-07-29 to 1,226 on 2026-08-25 (net +1,032). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 198168915967.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…Types I and III are commonly associated with supporting skin, hair, nails, and bone, while Types II and X are often used to support joint comfort.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Multi Collagen Complex | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 888 mg — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 198168915967 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | VEV |
| Source listing identifier | B0D3T1SPT4 |
| Retailer listing title | VEV Multi Collagen Peptides Powder, Types I, II, III, V & X, 41 Servin… show full titleVEV Multi Collagen Peptides Powder, Types I, II, III, V & X, 41 Servings |
| USPTO brand-owner record | AMERICAN GENCARE GROUP INC · Wyoming, USA · registration 7932496 · 30 N GOULD ST STE N, SHERIDAN, Wyoming 82801, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Xingqiao Chen · CHINA; WYOMING, USA · registration 6573678 · No.54, Group 3, Fenghuang Vil.,, Tucheng Countryside, Gulin County,, Luzhou, Sichuan, 646500, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 scoops (11 g approx.) |
| Servings per container | 41 |
| Net weight | NET WT 1 lb (16 oz) |
| Badges printed on pack | NSF, NSF Certified Quality, GLUTEN FREE, DAIRY FREE, SOY FREE, GMP, NON GMO, CONTENTS CERTIFIED, DIETARY SUPPLEMENT, CONTENTS CERTIFIED NSF |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 38.5 kcal | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 10 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C (as ascorbic acid) | 55 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Biotin (as d-biotin) | 2, 500 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Multi Collagen Complex | 10, 888 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hyaluronic Acid (as sodium hyaluronate) | 55 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Keratin | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Elastin | 4 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Ultra Absorbable - Dissolves in hot & cold water” · “With Biotin, Vitamin C, Hyaluronic Acid, Keratin, Elastin” · “Unflavored” · “Grass Fed” · “Pasture Raised” · “Support joint, nail, hair and skin*” · “We've upgraded the product and introduced a new odorless formula.” · “Free of: Soy, Dairy, Gluten & Tree nuts.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $19.98 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Biotin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
collagen peptides — PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 198168915967 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai