Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “DHT Blocker & Hair Growth
The panel lists “DHT Blocker & Hair Growth Blend” (1060 mg) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
Full record · 198715127188 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
We did the comparison: the per-serving claim uses 1.5 g, which equals DHT Blocker & Hair Growth Blend 1.06 g + Men's Vitality and Healthy Aging Blend 420 mg. It is a combined amount, not the amount of one ingredient. This explains the label framing; it does not independently test the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biotin | 5000 mcg | — | |
| Vitamin D (as Cholecalciferol) | 20 mcg | — | |
| Zinc (as Zinc Gluconate) | 15 mg | — | |
| DHT Blocker & Hair Growth Blend | 1060 mg | — | |
| Men's Vitality and Healthy Aging Blend | 420 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The listing uses 1.5 g for biotin. The panel lists biotin at 0.005 g; the other 1,495 mg is the rest of the listed blend. Panel addition: DHT Blocker & Hair Growth Blend 1060 mg + Men's Vitality and Healthy Aging Blend 420 mg = 1,480 mg. This documents the framing; it does not establish what is inside the product.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing says 1.5 g, while our photo read produced Biotin at 5 mg per serving. OCR can confuse small units and digits, so this remains unresolved until checked against the physical label.
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (8–40 mg), this product runs roughly $30 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Answered by the panel: the 1.5 g listing number equals DHT Blocker & Hair Growth Blend 1.06 g + Men's Vitality and Healthy Aging Blend 420 mg. What lot-specific document confirms those listed amounts?
The panel resolves what the headline number includes. The remaining question is whether the product in hand matches those listed amounts; ask for a lot-specific certificate of analysis.
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 198715127188.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Each batch is independently lab tested for potency and purity, with results published online for full transparency.…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…USA QUALITY & TRANSPARENCY: Made in the USA in a GMP-certified facility.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…Made in the USA…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…NATURAL DHT BLOCKER FOR HAIR GROWTH: Formulated to support healthy DHT levels — a key driver of hair thinning.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Zinc (as Zinc Gluconate) | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 15 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 198715127188 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | PEAK VITALS |
| Source listing identifier | B0DTN3JMXX |
| Retailer listing title | DHT Blocker for Men | Ultra Potent Hair Growth Formula | Saw Palmetto,… show full titleDHT Blocker for Men | Ultra Potent Hair Growth Formula | Saw Palmetto, Biotin, Pumpkin Seed, Herbal Extracts | Natural Hair Loss Supplements | Hair Regrowth Vitamins | Made in the USA | 90 Capsules |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 3 capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 90 Vegetable Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | MADE IN USA, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE, GMP CERTIFIED, MADE IN A FDA REGISTERED FACILITY, 3RD PARTY LAB VERIFIED, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE GMP CERTIFIE |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Biotin | 5000 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin D (as Cholecalciferol) | 20 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc (as Zinc Gluconate) | 15 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| DHT Blocker & Hair Growth Blend | 1060 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Men's Vitality and Healthy Aging Blend | 420 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Hair Growth + Vitality” · “Saw Palmetto + Biotin” · “1500mg blend per serving” · “Zinc. Vitamin D. Green Tea. Nettle Root. Fo-Ti. Pumpkin Seed. Ashwagandha. Reishi.” · “Scientifically crafted for maximum impact.” · “At Peak Vitals, every ingredient is expertly chosen with one purpose: real results.” · “Our natural DHT-Blocker formula uses synergistic botanicals to support hair health from multiple pathways.” · “Each ingredient is rigorously lab-tested for purity and safety, ensuring consistent quality in every bottle.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $29.99 checked Aug 10, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store peakvitals.co: 1 supplement product — a small, focused catalog — the shape of a brand built around its own line.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Biotin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 198715127188 · built August 10, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai