full reportFull record · 198715960945 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes 8 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A (as beta-carotene) | 1,500 mcg | — | |
| Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol) (Vitashine®) | 25 mcg (1,000 IU) | — | |
| Folate (as calcium L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate) | 667 mcg DFE | — | |
| Vitamin B12 (as methylcobalamin) | 100 mcg | — | |
| Biotin | 500 mcg | — | |
| Zinc (as zinc citrate) | 16.5 mg | — | |
| Selenium (as selenium glycinate complex) (Albion®) | 25 mcg | — | |
| Copper (as copper gluconate) | 0.9 mg | — | |
| Proprietary Blend: | 1,213.1 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
USPTO lists WELLBEL INC. (CORPORATION) in NEW YORK, USA; FLORIDA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 198715960945.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Professional-endorsement claim “…PHYSICIAN FORMULATED FOR AGES 45+: Women+ supports hormonal balance and increases collagen, elastin, and keratin production to nourish thinning hair and promote healthy ” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Origin claim “…Made in the USA…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…PHYSICIAN FORMULATED FOR AGES 45+: Women+ supports hormonal balance and increases collagen, elastin, and keratin production to nourish thinning hair and promote healthy ” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Zinc (as zinc citrate) | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 16.5 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 198715960945 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | WELLBEL |
| Source listing identifier | B0DBLV1X4J |
| Retailer listing title | WELLBEL Women + Clean Supplement for Hair, Skin, and Nails, Vegan, Glu… show full titleWELLBEL Women + Clean Supplement for Hair, Skin, and Nails, Vegan, Gluten Free, Non GMO 90 Count - 3 Pack |
| USPTO brand owner | WELLBEL INC. · CORPORATION · NEW YORK, USA; FLORIDA, USA |
| Owner filed address | 211 Kings Point Rd, Kings Point, NEW YORK 11024, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 3 Vegan Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 90 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | VEGAN, GLUTEN FREE, NON-GMO |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin A (as beta-carotene) | 1,500 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol) (Vitashine®) | 25 mcg (1,000 IU) | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Folate (as calcium L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate) | 667 mcg DFE | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 (as methylcobalamin) | 100 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Biotin | 500 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc (as zinc citrate) | 16.5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Selenium (as selenium glycinate complex) (Albion®) | 25 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Copper (as copper gluconate) | 0.9 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Proprietary Blend: | 1,213.1 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Beauty + Wellness. Backed by Science.” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT FOR AGES 45+” · “VEGAN” · “GLUTEN FREE” · “NON-GMO” · “HAIR + SKIN + NAILS” · “Physician-Formulated, Results-Driven” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT FOR AGES”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $210.00 checked Jul 27, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store wellbel.com: 13 supplement products — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin A — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,699) · UL 3000 mcg (preformed vitamin A (retinol); excludes beta-carotene)
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Folate — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,628) · UL 1000 mcg (synthetic folic acid from supplements/fortified food)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Biotin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Selenium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,481) · UL 400 mcg (adults)
Copper — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (9,405) · UL 10 mg (adults)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 198715960945 · built July 27, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai