lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 199284077027 · back to the summary

VitalVault Natural Testosterone Booster for Men

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 25, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00199284077027 · checked 2026-07-25

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

7listed rows
7separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 7 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)30 mg
Fenugreek 50%350 mg
Tongkat Ali Extract 200:1 (Eurycoma Longifolia Jack) (root)300 mg
Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) (root) (std to 5% total withanolides)250 mg
Maca Root Extract (Lepidium Meyenii)225 mg
Shilajit Extract (Fulvic Acid 50%)200 mg
Black Pepper Fruit Extract 95% (Piper nigrum)10 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out1

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how ashwagandha, tongkat ali, fenugreek, maca root have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.

No data

This category has documented FDA fraud risk

FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).

No data

Public label filing not saved

This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 199284077027.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…der regular exercise demand Made In The USA, Third-Party Tested: Produced in a GMP-certified facility and in…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Manufacturing claim
“…n The USA, Third-Party Tested: Produced in a GMP-certified facility and independently tested…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Origin claim
“…m consistently under regular exercise demand Made In The USA, Third-Party Tested: Produced in a GMP-certi…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…and Maca, Muscle Builder, Stamina and Energy Support Pills 7-IN-1 Testosterone Support Formula: T…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) (root) (std
shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label
250 mg — within the studied range
Tongkat Ali Extract 200:1 (Eurycoma Longifol
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–400 mg) · bar = this label
300 mg — within the studied range
Fenugreek 50%
shaded = doses used in studies (500 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label
350 mg — below the studied range
Maca Root Extract (Lepidium Meyenii)
shaded = doses used in studies (1.5 g–3 g) · bar = this label
225 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID199284077027 — via source listing UPC
BrandVitalVault
Source listing identifierB0FHP2YN8J
Retailer listing titleVitalVault Natural Testosterone Booster for Men, 7-in-1 Male Performan…
show full title VitalVault Natural Testosterone Booster for Men, 7-in-1 Male Performance Supplement with Tongkat Ali, Ashwagandha, Shilajit, Fenugreek and Maca, Muscle Builder, Stamina and Energy Support Pills

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size2 Capsules
Servings per container30
Pack statement60 DIETARY CAPSULES
Badges printed on packOCB ORGANIZATION OF COMPETITION BOISE, GMP, NON GMO, FDA, 3RD PARTY LAB TESTED, MADE IN USA

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)30 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Fenugreek 50%350 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Tongkat Ali Extract 200:1 (Eurycoma Longifolia Jack) (root)300 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) (root) (std to 5% total wit250 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Maca Root Extract (Lepidium Meyenii)225 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Shilajit Extract (Fulvic Acid 50%)200 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Black Pepper Fruit Extract 95% (Piper nigrum)10 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“7 IN 1 FORMULA” · “Supports Muscle Growth & Strength” · “Daily Vitality + Libido Support” · “Energy & Motivation Support” · “Recovery & Stress Support” · “FOUNDER FORMULATED.” · “PERFORMANCE TESTED.” · “THE STANDARD IS HIGHER.”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$44.99 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

AshwagandhaNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

ashwagandhaNIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · FDA — tainted sexual-enhancement products · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).

tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia)PubMed search: Eurycoma longifolia randomized trial · NIH NCCIH — Herbs at a glance · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1 registered studies

Use pattern in research: extract standardization varies widely between products; a raw-powder milligram figure is not comparable to a standardized-extract dose used in studies.

fenugreekPubMed search: fenugreek extract randomized controlled trial · NIH NCCIH — Fenugreek · ClinicalTrials.gov — 60 registered studies

Use pattern in research: studied as a standardized extract over 8–12 weeks; may interact with blood-thinning and blood-sugar medication — documented interaction, not advice.

maca rootPubMed search: Lepidium meyenii randomized trial · NIH NCCIH — Maca · ClinicalTrials.gov — 9 registered studies

Use pattern in research: studied for libido-related endpoints; research generally does not show testosterone changes — the two are often conflated in marketing.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 199284077027 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai