Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 199284894457 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 6 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAD (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide) | 500 mg | — | |
| Resveratrol | 100 mg | — | |
| UltraUro® Urolithin A | 50 mg | — | |
| Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) | 50 mg | — | |
| Giloy Extract (Tinospora cordifolia) (Herb) | 10 mg | — | |
| Muira Puama Powder (Ptychopetalum olacoides) (Bark) | 10 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Graystone LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in MINNESOTA, USA; TEXAS, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The dated series runs from 87 written reviews on September 26, 2025 to 214 on June 29, 2026. Up to 197 written reviews were added within a single ~30-day window — 92% of the total. Sudden bursts are the usual fingerprint of incentivized or bought reviews; a steady climb is not.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 87 on 2025-09-26 to 214 on 2026-06-29 (net +127). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 199284894457.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…Made in GMP-Certified Facility…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…MADE IN USA…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…[Muira Puama-Driven Herbal Support Complex] – Features Muira Puama Giloy (Tinospora cordifolia), a traditional botanical used in wellness routines for immune balance, di” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 199284894457 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Etta Vita |
| Source listing identifier | B0F347HYWZ |
| Retailer listing title | Liposomal NAD+ Supplement with Resveratrol, Urolithin A & CoQ10, 60 Ca… show full titleLiposomal NAD+ Supplement with Resveratrol, Urolithin A & CoQ10, 60 Capsule |
| USPTO brand owner | Graystone LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · MINNESOTA, USA; TEXAS, USA |
| Owner filed address | 2045 W Grand Ave Ste B, Chicago, ILLINOIS 60612, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 NU-FLOW® ENABLED CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan-Friendly, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, Keto-Friendly, Made in the USA, Third-Party Labs, FDA, Made in FDA-Registered Facility |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| NAD (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide) | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Resveratrol | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| UltraUro® Urolithin A | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Giloy Extract (Tinospora cordifolia) (Herb) | 10 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Muira Puama Powder (Ptychopetalum olacoides) (Bark) | 10 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“5-in-1 Healthy Aging Formula*” · “Resveratrol | CoQ10 | Giloy” · “MADE IN USA” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “Made in the USA” · “Made in FDA-Registered Facility” · “Made in GMP-Certified Facility” · “Healthy Aging Complex*”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $39.95 checked Aug 10, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store ettavita.com: 15 supplement products (+11 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 199284894457 · built August 10, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai