Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 199874462882 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 15 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | 15 mg | — | |
| %DV | 136 % | — | |
| 330 | 330 mg | — | |
| 300 | 300 mg | — | |
| 243 | 243 mg | — | |
| 174 | 174 mg | — | |
| 1482 | 1482 mg | — | |
| 75 | 75 mg | — | |
| 60 | 60 mg | — | |
| 60 | 60 mg | — | |
| 30 | 30 mg | — | |
| 30 | 30 mg | — | |
| 15 | 15 mg | — | |
| 10 | 10 mg | — | |
| 10 | 10 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Riwang Huang (INDIVIDUAL; OTHER) in China; HONG KONG for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Written reviews rose from 2 to 108 between April 15 and August 23, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 48, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The label visibly shows: “60 appears more than once”; “30 appears more than once”; “10 appears more than once”. This is a specific printing or product-image inconsistency worth checking on the package.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-04-01 to 108 on 2026-08-23 (net +108). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
The package says distributed by: PICKYOUTH INC, 1621 CENTRAL AVE STE 9333 CHEYENNE, WY 82001. USPTO names Riwang Huang as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 199874462882.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…3RD PARTY LAB TESTED…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Speed-of-results claim “…Fast-Acting.…” | No evidence located We looked for: a study measuring the stated outcome over the stated time | We found no study of this product measuring the stated outcome over the stated timeframe. |
| Manufacturing claim “…Every bottle is made in a USA GMP facility.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…3X Superior Absorption] Synergy-T improves men's total performance, it is ideal for gym sessions, eSports, long work or study.…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 199874462882 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | PickYouth |
| Source listing identifier | B0FVFNKXG9 |
| Retailer listing title | PickYouth Synergy-T Testosterone Booster Supplement for Men, Total Mal… show full titlePickYouth Synergy-T Testosterone Booster Supplement for Men, Total Male Performance, Liposomal Absorption System, 100% Transparency with Ashwagandha, DIM, Turkesterone, Zinc & Tongkat Ali, 90 Count |
| USPTO brand owner | Riwang Huang · INDIVIDUAL; OTHER · China; HONG KONG |
| Owner filed address | Liyuan Town, Heping County, No.37,Chiling Vil,Shanxia Village Comm., Heyuan, Guangdong, 517258, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | ring Sze 3 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 90 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | 3RD PARTY LAB TESTED, GMP CERTIFIED PRACTICE, NON-GMO, Vegan, GMP CERTIFIED, DIETARY SUPPLEMENT, eurofins, IN THE USA, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE, PURE AND NATURAL |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Amount | 15 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| %DV | 136 % | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 330 | 330 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 300 | 300 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 243 | 243 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 174 | 174 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 1482 | 1482 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 75 | 75 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 60 | 60 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 60 | 60 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 30 | 30 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 30 | 30 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 15 | 15 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 10 | 10 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| 10 | 10 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Rapid Activation ‡” · “Stress-load Formula ‡” · “Alpha VigorCore ‡” · “Revolutionary Formula Beyond Basics” · “Fast-Acting. Feel it sooner.” · “Gentle. Well-tolerated.” · “Natural energy & focus.” · “Proven results.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $35.58 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store pickyouth.com: 3 supplement products — a small, focused catalog — the shape of a brand built around its own line.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 199874462882 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai