The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible
Claimed magnesium 150.0 mg is 2% of the ≈8,800 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 199874839240) — within physical limits.
Full record · 199874839240 · back to the summary
doingwell Electrolytes Sugar Free, Electrolytes Zero Sugar Powder Packets Sweetened with…
Exact product checkedGTIN 00199874839240 · checked 2026-08-02
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 150 mg magnesium claim matches the panel
MARKETING150 mg — per-serving claim
PANELMAGNESIUM 150 mg — same amountPOTASSIUM 220 mg + MAGNESIUM 150 mg
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 150 mg of magnesium, and the listing-image panel shows 150 mg magnesium 1 stick packet(8.8g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALORIES | 10 | — | |
| TOTAL FAT | 0 g | — | |
| SATURATED FAT | 0 g | — | |
| TRANS FAT | 0 g | — | |
| CHOLESTEROL | 0 mg | — | |
| SODIUM | 1,070 mg | — | |
| TOTAL CARBOHYDRATE | 2 g | — | |
| DIETARY FIBER | 0 g | — | |
| TOTAL SUGARS | 0 g | — | |
| INCLUDES ADDED SUGARS | 0 g | — | |
| PROTEIN | 0 g | — | |
| VITAMIN D | 0 mcg | — | |
| CALCIUM | 20 mg | — | |
| IRON | 0 mg | — | |
| POTASSIUM | 220 mg | — | |
| MAGNESIUM | 150 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out6
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Testing claim names a recognized certifier
The package carries a Informed Sport seal, which we read from the product photographs. We have not queried Informed Sport's own registry for this exact product, so this records the certifier the brand names — not a confirmation from that certifier.
Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists DOINGWELL INC. (CORPORATION) in DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 199874839240 to "Raspberry Electrolytes" (Doingwell) — consistent with this listing.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 0 to 13 between April 23 and July 29, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 10, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing9
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listing claim matches the label panel
The listing claims 150 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows MAGNESIUM at 150 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Magnesium amount, in daily-intake context
label states 150 mg/serving — about 36% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
30 servings × 8.8 g = 264 g, matching the printed net weight 264 g (NET WT: 9.3oz (264g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Cost to reach a studied dose
At 1.3 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $60 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how magnesium, prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-04-23 to 13 on 2026-07-29 (net +13). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: the 0.15 g listing number equals CALCIUM 20 mg + MAGNESIUM 150 mg. What lot-specific document confirms those listed amounts?
The panel resolves what the headline number includes. The remaining question is whether the product in hand matches those listed amounts; ask for a lot-specific certificate of analysis.
2
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 199874839240.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Clean Ingredients, Third Party Tested: Vegan, keto friendly, dairy free, GMO free, kosher electrolyte powder packets; sugar free electrolyte powder packets with Himalaya” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| MAGNESIUM | shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label | 150 mg — below the studied range |
| prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) | Studies typically use 3 g–10 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- magnesium — daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 199874839240 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | doingwell |
| Source listing identifier | B0GY5RV8Q7 |
| Retailer listing title | doingwell Electrolytes Sugar Free, Electrolytes Zero Sugar Powder Pack… show full titledoingwell Electrolytes Sugar Free, Electrolytes Zero Sugar Powder Packets Sweetened with Organic Natural Fruit, Contains Sodium Potassium Magnesium, Keto Vegan, 30 Hydration Sticks (Raspberry) |
| USPTO brand owner | DOINGWELL INC. · CORPORATION · DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 8118 BEVERLY BLVD., LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90048, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 STICK PACKET(8.8g) |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Net weight | NET WT: 9.3oz (264g) |
| Pack statement | 30 STICK PACKETS |
| Badges printed on pack | Informed Sport, WE TEST - YOU TRUST, WE TEST • YOU TRUST, Informed Sport Certified |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| CALORIES | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| TOTAL FAT | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| SATURATED FAT | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| TRANS FAT | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| CHOLESTEROL | 0 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| SODIUM | 1,070 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| TOTAL CARBOHYDRATE | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| DIETARY FIBER | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| TOTAL SUGARS | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| INCLUDES ADDED SUGARS | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| PROTEIN | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| VITAMIN D | 0 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| CALCIUM | 20 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| IRON | 0 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| POTASSIUM | 220 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| MAGNESIUM | 150 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“ZERO SUGAR” · “RASPBERRY WITH OTHER NATURAL FLAVORS” · “1000 mg SODIUM” · “220 mg POTASSIUM” · “150 mg MAGNESIUM” · “The supplement industry isn't regulated for anyone.” · “You deserve to know what's really in your product too.” · “We test every single batch.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $45.00 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Iron — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Magnesium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
magnesium — NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies
ℹ Dosage: label states 150 mg/serving — about 36% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) — NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 199874839240 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai