lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 324208697627 · back to the summary

PreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 21, 2026

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

Intake method matches the research

Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (zinc). For example, zinc: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

Each ingredient’s amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

No data yet: Trademark owner candidates are ambiguous

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-related marks with the exact brand wordmark and different registrants. The owner is withheld until the product-to-mark identity is pinned down.

i

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the photos (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

i

Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

i

Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity

Open Food Facts resolves 324208697627 to "preservision" (brand not supplied), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.

i

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 7,287 on 2026-01-26 to 7,469 on 2026-07-13 (net +182). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

i

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…etter Absorbing Nutrient 6 Key Ingredients 1 Clinically Proven Nutrient Formula Exact Clinically Proven ARE…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
No named, citable study of this product or formula was located in public sources. The claim may rest on ingredient-level research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“PreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, Lutein and Zeaxanthin Supplement with…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Benefit claim
“…rients that include Lutein & Zeaxanthin that promote eye health, including PreserVision. BAUSCH +…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Zinc
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
40 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID324208697627
BrandPreserVision
Source listing identifierB00DJUK8HS
Retailer listing titlePreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, Lu…
show full title PreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, Lutein and Zeaxanthin Supplement with Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Zinc, and Copper, 120 Softgels (Minigels)

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Mini Soft Gel
Pack statement120 SOFT GELS
Badges printed on packDOCTOR #1 BRAND RECOMMENDED

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Vitamin C250 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E90 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc40 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Copper1 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Lutein5 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zeaxanthin1 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Better Absorbing Nutrient” · “6 Key Ingredients” · “1 Clinically Proven Nutrient Formula” · “Exact Clinically Proven AREDS2 Nutrient Formula” · “Recommended by the National Eye Institute” · “to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced AMD progression” · “Only PreserVision® has OCUSorb™™ for 2X Better Nutrient Absorption” · “Two Soft Gels Per Day”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Listed ingredients (as stated on the listing)

Ascorbic acid, dl-alpha tocopheryl acetate, gelatin, glycerin, zinc oxide, medium chain triglycerides, carmine, cupric oxide, titanium dioxide. Lutein, zeaxanthin.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

CopperNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (9,405) · UL 10 mg (adults)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 324208697627 · built July 21, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai