lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 324208697634 · back to the summary

PreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 22, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 324208697634 · checked 2026-07-21

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

6declared rows
6separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 6 declared rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Vitamin C250 mg
Vitamin E200 IU
Zinc40 mg
Copper1 mg
Lutein5 mg
Zeaxanthin1 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Each ingredient’s amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

No data yet: Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, BAUSCH & LOMB PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

i

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

i

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

i

Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

i

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

i

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 729 on 2026-02-07 to 743 on 2026-06-22 (net +14). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

i

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…D BERRY FLAVOR 2 PER DAY 6 Key Ingredients 1 Clinically Proven Nutrient Formula to help reduce the risk of…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
No named, citable study of this product or formula was located in public sources. The claim may rest on ingredient-level research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“PreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, Chewable Lutein and Zeaxanthin Supple…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Benefit claim
“…rients that include Lutein & Zeaxanthin that promote eye health, including PreserVision. BAUSCH +…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Zinc
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
40 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID324208697634
BrandPreserVision
Source listing identifierB07D6DQF15
Retailer listing titlePreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, Ch…
show full title PreserVision AREDS 2 Eye Vitamins, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, Chewable Lutein and Zeaxanthin Supplement with Vitamin C, Vitamin E,Zinc, and Copper, Mixed Berry, 60 Tablets
USPTO brand-owner recordBausch & Lomb Incorporated · NEW YORK, USA · registration 7138985 · 1400 N. Goodman Street, Rochester, NEW YORK 14609, UNITED STATES
USPTO brand-owner recordBAUSCH & LOMB PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · DELAWARE, USA; NEW YORK, USA · registration 2696725 · 8500 HIDDEN RIVER PARKWAY, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33637, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 chewable tablet
Pack statement60 CHEWABLE TABLETS

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Vitamin C250 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E200 IUHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc40 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Copper1 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Lutein5 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zeaxanthin1 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“EYE VITAMIN AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENT” · “AREDS 2 FORMULA” · “DOCTOR RECOMMENDED BRAND” · “Great-Tasting Chewable!” · “MIXED BERRY FLAVOR” · “2 PER DAY” · “6 Key Ingredients” · “1 Clinically Proven Nutrient Formula”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

CopperNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (9,405) · UL 10 mg (adults)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 324208697634 · built July 22, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai