lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 324208698648 · back to the summary

PreserVision, AREDS 2 Formula + Multi Vitamin, 100 Softgels

LOW public verifiability · 2 of 6 trust signals · built July 21, 2026

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

Intake method matches the research

Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (magnesium, zinc, multivitamin / greens blend). For example, magnesium: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

Each ingredient’s amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

UPC independently corroborated

UPCitemdb resolves 324208698648 to "PreserVision AREDS 2 + Multivitamin 2-in-1 Eye Vitamin Contains Vitamin C D " (PreserVision) — consistent with this listing.

No data yet: Review authenticity: not yet analyzed

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. Authenticity not analysed: burst, purge and stockout patterns need price/review history.

i

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the photos (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

i

Zinc amount, in daily-intake context

label states 180 mg/serving — about 450% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 8–11 mg; NIH sets 40 mg/day as the tolerable upper limit for adults). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate and gluconate labels may state compound mass rather than elemental zinc. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

i

Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…ct Levels of 6 key nutrients from the AREDS2 clinical study: Lutein 10 mg Zeaxanthin 2 mg Vit. E…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
No named, citable study of this product or formula was located in public sources. The claim may rest on ingredient-level research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“…nt 2 in 1 Formula 100 SOFT GELS 2 PER DAY #1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED BRAND”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
50 mg — below the studied range
Zinc
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
40 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos· Dose claim stated on listing — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID324208698648 — via vitacost.com listing
BrandPreserVision
Listing identifierSHOP-1049100877

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Soft Gel
Pack statement100 SOFT GELS
Badges printed on pack#1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED BRAND

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories5 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat< 0.5 g High
clearly legible in the photo
Saturated Fat< 0.5 g High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate<1 g High
clearly legible in the photo
Protein<1g High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C250 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D7.5 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E90 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K15 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Thiamin0.75 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Riboflavin0.85 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Niacin10 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B61 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Folate333 mcg DFE High
clearly legible in the photo
Folic acid200 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B1212.5 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Biotin15 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Pantothenic Acid5 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Iodine75 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium50 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc40 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Selenium9.5 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Copper1 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Manganese1 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Chromium25 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“EYE VITAMIN AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENT” · “AREDS 2 FORMULA” · “DOCTOR #1 BRAND RECOMMENDED” · “MULTI VITAMIN” · “Convenient 2 in 1 Formula” · “100 SOFT GELS” · “2 PER DAY”

Read by a vision model from 3 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
vitacost.com$39.27

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Dosage: label states 180 mg/serving — about 450% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 8–11 mg; NIH sets 40 mg/day as the tolerable upper limit for adults). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate and gluconate labels may state compound mass rather than elemental zinc.

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

multivitamin / greens blendNIH ODS — Multivitamin/mineral supplements fact sheet · PubMed search: multivitamin supplementation outcomes · ClinicalTrials.gov — 497 registered studies

Use pattern in research: research evaluates multivitamins ingredient-by-ingredient — blend-level health claims outrun what blend-level evidence can show.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 324208698648 · built July 21, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai