lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 324208698648 · back to the summary

PreserVision AREDS 2 + Multivitamin, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built September 03, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00324208698648 · checked 2026-07-21

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

27listed rows
27separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 27 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories5
Total Fat< 0.5 g
Saturated Fat< 0.5 g
Total Carbohydrate<1 g
Protein<1 g
Vitamin C250 mg
Vitamin D7.5 mcg
Vitamin E90 mg
Vitamin K15 mcg
Thiamin0.75 mg
Riboflavin0.85 mg
Niacin10 mg
Vitamin B61 mg
Folate333 mcg DFE
Vitamin B1212.5 mcg
Biotin15 mcg
Pantothenic Acid5 mg
Iodine75 mcg
Magnesium50 mg
Zinc40 mg
Selenium9.5 mcg
Copper1 mg
Manganese1 mg
Chromium25 mcg
Molybdenum22.5 mcg
Lutein5 mg
Zeaxanthins1 mg

vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out0

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, BAUSCH & LOMB PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 670 on 2025-08-02 to 734 on 2026-08-14 (net +64). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?

Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

4

Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?

An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 324208698648.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…EXACT levels of 6 key nutrients from the AREDS2 clinical study*…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“PreserVision AREDS 2 + Multivitamin, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, 2-in-1 Eye Vitamin with Lutein, Zeaxanthin, Zinc, and Vitamin C, D & E, 100 Softgels…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Origin claim
“…MADE IN USA”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…EYE VITAMINS FOR HEALTHY EYES: Bausch + Lomb carries a full line of ocular supplements with vitamins, minerals & nutrients that promote eye health, including Ocuvite eye”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
50 mg — below the studied range
Zinc
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
40 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID324208698648
BrandPreserVision
Source listing identifierB01EOA7QYY
Retailer listing titlePreserVision AREDS 2 + Multivitamin, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, …
show full title PreserVision AREDS 2 + Multivitamin, #1 Eye Doctor Recommended Brand, 2-in-1 Eye Vitamin with Lutein, Zeaxanthin, Zinc, and Vitamin C, D & E, 100 Softgels
USPTO brand-owner recordBausch & Lomb Incorporated · NEW YORK, USA · registration 7138985 · 1400 N. Goodman Street, Rochester, NEW YORK 14609, UNITED STATES
USPTO brand-owner recordBAUSCH & LOMB PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · DELAWARE, USA; NEW YORK, USA · registration 2696725 · 8500 HIDDEN RIVER PARKWAY, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33637, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Soft Gel
Pack statement100 SOFT GELS
Badges printed on packMADE IN USA

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories5 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat< 0.5 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Saturated Fat< 0.5 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate<1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein<1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C250 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D7.5 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E90 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K15 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Thiamin0.75 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Riboflavin0.85 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Niacin10 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B61 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Folate333 mcg DFE High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B1212.5 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Biotin15 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Pantothenic Acid5 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iodine75 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium50 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc40 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Selenium9.5 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Copper1 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Manganese1 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Chromium25 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Molybdenum22.5 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“DOCTOR #1 BRAND RECOMMENDED” · “Convenient 2 in 1 Formula” · “2 PER DAY” · “MANUFACTURED & PACKAGED IN THE USA WITH USA & IMPORTED INGREDIENTS” · “actual size” · “1 IN THE MORNING” · “1 IN THE EVENING” · “Combines the benefits of PreserVision® AREDS 2 Formula PLUS A DAILY MULTIVITAMIN”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
vitacost.com$39.27

Official brand domain: www.preservision.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

Vitamin KNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin

ThiaminNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,262) · no UL established

RiboflavinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,172) · no UL established

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

Vitamin B6NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)

FolateNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,628) · UL 1000 mcg (synthetic folic acid from supplements/fortified food)

Vitamin B12NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established

BiotinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests

Pantothenic AcidNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (601) · no UL established

IodineNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (6,462) · UL 1100 mcg (adults)

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

SeleniumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,481) · UL 400 mcg (adults)

CopperNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (9,405) · UL 10 mg (adults)

ManganeseNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,608) · UL 11 mg (adults)

MolybdenumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (809) · UL 2000 mcg (adults)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 324208698648 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai