The panel states Iron (as ferrous sulfate) 65 mg per serving.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Specific fact confirmed
USPTO lists BML Online, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in FLORIDA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells thi…
Specific fact confirmed
UPCitemdb resolves 380513000774 to "Puregen Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg. 65 mg. Elemental Iron. 200 Tablets" (Puregen Labs) — consistent with this listing.
We did the comparison: the listing claims 65 mg of iron (as ferrous sulfate), and the listing-image panel shows 65 mg iron (as ferrous sulfate) 1 tablet. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron (as ferrous sulfate) | 65 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
210 174th St, Apt 1502, Sunny Isles Beach, FLORIDA 33160, UNITED STATES
Filed address
210 174th St, Apt 1502, Sunny Isles Beach, FLORIDA 33160, UNITED STATES
This is the USPTO owner of the brand wordmark. It tells a shopper who is behind the brand, but does not by itself identify the manufacturer or prove where this product was made.
Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 238 to 283 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.
Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
UPCitemdb resolves 380513000774 to "Puregen Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg. 65 mg. Elemental Iron. 200 Tablets" (Puregen Labs) — consistent with this listing.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists BML Online, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in FLORIDA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing claims 65 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Iron (as ferrous sulfate) at 65 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 238 on 2026-02-12 to 283 on 2026-07-08 (net +45). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 380513000774.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.