LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00380513101105P Puregen Labs · checked Aug 6, 2026 · on sale since Nov 27, 2020🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · BML Online, LLC · FLORIDA, USA
Quick read · P Puregen Labs

Zinc 220mg [High Potency] Supplement – Zinc Sulfate for Immune…

Checked against public sources on August 6, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

100tablets

Does the marketing hold up?

The label’s 220 mg reads 4× larger than the zinc on the panel. Salt weight, not the actual mineral. 220 mg is the weight of the zinc sulfate compound. The actual zinc in it is 50 mg. You are getting 50 mg of zinc per serving.

Is the dose real?!Label says 220 mg · panel says 50 mg
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸BML Online, LLClimited liability company · FLORIDA, USA
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

2◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 1 Tablet

Zinc (from 220 mg* of zinc sulfate)50 mg

Printed on the package: VEGETARIAN FRIENDLY · GLUTEN FREE · ALLERGEN FREE

We read 1 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

Partly confirmed2

“Zinc 220mg [High Potency] Supplement – Zinc Sulfate for Immune Support System 100”

Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Evidence →
“product is made in a facility following strict GMP guidelines to ensure safety and”

“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

Quick read · 2 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 1 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedWho is behind it?

The barcode identity checks out · 380513101105.

The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.

Evidence and sources

UPCitemdb resolves 380513101105 to "Zinc 220mg [High Potency] Supplement Zinc Sulfate for Immune Support System 100 " (Puregen Labs) — consistent with this listing.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 2
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
BML Online, LLCLimited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for P PUREGEN LABS
Registration6680401
Registered2022-03-22
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded

Filed address
210 174th St, Apt 1502, Sunny Isles Beach, FLORIDA 33160, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.

Dose vs research

Zinc

50 mg per serving — above the 8–40 mg/day used in the linked studies.

Linked ingredient research · label amount, not a recommendation
Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 50 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits above that range.

0studied 8 mg–40 mg

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built August 06, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.