The observed listing says it is tested, but names no lab or certifier.
A testing badge without an issuer or report is a marketing claim, not evidence. Ask for the lab name and lot-specific report.
Exact product checked · GTIN 603573274511Healthy Origins · observed 2026-07-23
The useful read · Healthy Origins
Healthy Origins Vitamin D3 & K2
The observed listing says it is tested, but names no lab or certifier.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
60softgels
60servings per container
The barcode identity checks out · 603573274511.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Where it sells
Prices found, with identity limits shown
A brand storefront was found, but no exact-product comparison could be completed.
Walmart and iHerb require an exact UPC/GTIN match before their price, panel, or reviews can be attached. Product-name results are treated only as leads, never as this product. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Shopper scorecard
The useful findings, in decision order.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
Who is behind it?
Checks outBarcode / GTIN record
The barcode identity checks out · 603573274511.
UPCitemdb resolves 603573274511 to "Healthy Origins Vitamin D3 2 000 IU (50 mcg) & K2 200 mcg (Non-GMO 3rd Party Te" (Healthy Origins) — consistent with this listing.
Why it mattersThe outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Open the source-linked findingAny trouble on the record?
Needs explanationCertification / laboratory record
The observed listing says it is tested, but names no lab or certifier.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report or matching NSF product entry is retained, so the claim cannot be verified as stated.
Why it mattersA testing badge without an issuer or report is a marketing claim, not evidence. Ask for the lab name and lot-specific report.
Sources checkedObserved listing claimclaim surfaceNSF certified-products registryoutside registry checked
Open the source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
- Not yet in NIH's public label registry.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
What would settle the biggest open question?
Can the testing claim be tied to a named laboratory and this product lot? Evidence that would settle it: lot-specific COA naming the laboratory and matching the product lot.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out01
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
UPCitemdb resolves 603573274511 to "Healthy Origins Vitamin D3 2 000 IU (50 mcg) & K2 200 mcg (Non-GMO 3rd Party Te" (Healthy Origins) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution00
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Review-count history: not available
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report or matching NSF product entry is retained, so the claim cannot be verified as stated.
Panel amounts are awaiting a clearer image read
The current image extraction retained 2 ingredient name(s) but no usable amounts. This is a LookCloser processing gap, not evidence that the brand withheld the numbers; dose arithmetic is withheld until the panel is re-read.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 603573274511.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.