The headline amount is not tied to a same-name panel row
You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Exact product checked · GTIN 603902115652Brain Bean · observed 2026-07-22
The useful read · Brain Bean
Brain Basics Ultra Iodine Complex Supplement for Thyroid…
The headline amount is not tied to a same-name panel row
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
90tablets
90servings per container
Shopper scorecard
The useful findings, in decision order.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
Is the label honest?
Public contextListing claim vs Supplement Facts
The headline amount is not tied to a same-name panel row
The listing presents 8 mg for potassium, but vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 does not contain a same-name quantified row. The retained image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Why it mattersYou are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Open the source-linked findingWhat remains open 4
- Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
- Not yet in NIH's public label registry.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out00
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
What needs caution00
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Review-count history: not available
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
The headline amount is not tied to a same-name panel row
The listing presents 8 mg for potassium, but vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 does not contain a same-name quantified row. The retained image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Panel amounts are awaiting a clearer image read
The current image extraction retained 1 ingredient name(s) but no usable amounts. This is a LookCloser processing gap, not evidence that the brand withheld the numbers; dose arithmetic is withheld until the panel is re-read.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
2
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 603902115652.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.