Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 605069060356 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 5 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic ashwagandha powder (root) | 380 mg | — | |
| (0.2% Withanolides | 0.76 mg) | — | |
| Organic ashwagandha extract (root) | 280 mg | — | |
| (0.5% Withanolides | 1.4 mg) | — | |
| Organic ashwagandha supercritical CO2 extract (root) (Withania somnifera) (8% Withanolides | 0.8 mg) | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists THE HIMALAYA DRUG COMPANY (CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in DELAWARE, USA; CAYMAN ISLANDS for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Open Food Facts resolves 605069060356 to "Organic Ashwagandha" (Himalaya) — consistent with this listing.
Written reviews rose from 0 to 7 between September 20, 2025 and August 11, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 1, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how ashwagandha have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2025-09-20 to 7 on 2026-08-11 (net +7). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 605069060356.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…Daily stress relief supplement: This clinically studied blend of Ashwagandha root powder and root extract supports the body’s natural response to emotional, mental, and ” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Benefit claim “Himalaya Organic Ashwagandha Root, 30 Day Supply - Herbal Adrenal Support Supplements for Stress Relief and Energy Support - USDA Organic, Non-GMO, Vegan, Gluten Free, 67” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Organic ashwagandha powder (root) | shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label | 380 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 605069060356 |
| Brand | Himalaya |
| Source listing identifier | B09ZH8J5PQ |
| Retailer listing title | Himalaya Organic Ashwagandha Root, 30 Day Supply - Herbal Adrenal Supp… show full titleHimalaya Organic Ashwagandha Root, 30 Day Supply - Herbal Adrenal Support Supplements for Stress Relief and Energy Support - USDA Organic, Non-GMO, Vegan, Gluten Free, 670 mg, 30 Caplets |
| USPTO brand owner | THE HIMALAYA DRUG COMPANY · CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · DELAWARE, USA; CAYMAN ISLANDS |
| Owner filed address | 10440 Westoffice Dr., Houston, TEXAS 77042, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Caplet |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 30 CAPLETS |
| Badges printed on pack | NON GMO Project VERIFIED, USDA ORGANIC, NON GMO, USDA Organic,, Non-GMO, ADDITIVE FREE, 100% PLANT-BASED, CGMP CERTIFIED, NON GMO VERIFIED, USDA CERTIFIED, NON-GMO VERIFIED |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Organic ashwagandha powder (root) | 380 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| (0.2% Withanolides | 0.76 mg) | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic ashwagandha extract (root) | 280 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| (0.5% Withanolides | 1.4 mg) | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic ashwagandha supercritical CO2 extract (root) (Withan | 0.8 mg) | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Releases stress & boosts energy” · “Rejuvenates adrenal function” · “Clinically studied to reduce stress*” · “Helps improve mood and emotional balance*” · “Supports mental clarity and focus*” · “Improves concentration and promotes learning ability*” · “Promotes stress relief*” · “Supports calming serenity*”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $25.27 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: himalayausa.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Ashwagandha — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
ashwagandha — NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 605069060356 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai