lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 617459000095 · back to the summary

AdvoCare Rehydrate Electrolyte Drink Mix, Fruit Punch

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built August 02, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00617459000095 · checked 2026-07-31

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 120 mg vitamin c claim matches the panel

MARKETING120 mg — listing title
PANELVitamin C 120 mg — same amountCalcium 100 mg + Potassium 100 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 120 mg of vitamin c, and the listing-image panel shows 120 mg vitamin c 1 stick pack (12g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories40
Total Fat0 g
Saturated Fat0 g
Trans Fat0 g
Cholesterol0 mg
Sodium100 mg
Total Carbohydrate9 g
Dietary Fiber0 g
Total Sugars6 g
Includes Added Sugars6 g
Protein0 g
Vitamin D0 mcg
Iron0 mg
Vitamin A300 mcg
Thiamin0.15 mg
Niacin2 mg
Pantothenic Acid0.6 mg
Chromium4.8 mcg
Calcium100 mg
Potassium100 mg
Vitamin C120 mg
Riboflavin0.17 mg
Vitamin B62 mg
Magnesium40 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 19 to 42 between July 4, 2025 and July 18, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 14, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing9

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: AdvoCare International, L.P., AdvoCare International, L.L.C.. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

This recall is not about the product on this page. AdvoCare International, LP recalled a different product on November 12, 2018. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “SleepWorks Liquid Vitamin & Mineral Herbal Supplement 12 single serving bottles - 2 Fl Oz (60 mL) Net 24 Fl Oz (720 mL), product code W3721”. FDA recorded the reason as “Product contains beta phenyl gamma aminobutyric acid HCl”. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 15 actives sum to 365 mg, which fits inside the ≈12,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

15 servings × 12 g = 180 g, matching the printed net weight 178.6 g (NET WT 6.3 OZ (178.6g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 27 on 2025-06-27 to 42 on 2026-07-18 (net +15). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: the 0.12 g listing number equals Thiamin 0.15 mg + Calcium 100 mg. What lot-specific document confirms those listed amounts?

The panel resolves what the headline number includes. The remaining question is whether the product in hand matches those listed amounts; ask for a lot-specific certificate of analysis.

2

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 617459000095.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…THIRD PARTY TESTED…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Benefit claim
“…Optimal Performance: B vitamin enriched to help fight fatigue and support steady energy, giving you powerful hydration support in an easy-to-transport single-serving sti”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
40 mg — below the studied range
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)Studies typically use 3 g–10 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID617459000095 — via source listing UPC
BrandAdvoCare
Source listing identifierB0DKTX8MHG
Retailer listing titleAdvoCare Rehydrate Electrolyte Drink Mix, Fruit Punch, 15 Sticks…
show full title AdvoCare Rehydrate Electrolyte Drink Mix, Fruit Punch, 15 Sticks
USPTO brand-owner recordAdvoCare International, L.P. · DELAWARE, USA · registration 5091165 · 2801 Summit Ave., Plano, TEXAS 75074, UNITED STATES
USPTO brand-owner recordAdvoCare International, L.L.C. · DELAWARE, USA · registration 1959765 · 2727 Realty, Suite 134, Carrollton, TEXAS 75006, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 stick pack (12g)
Servings per container15
Net weightNET WT 6.3 OZ (178.6g)
Pack statement15 STICK PACKS - 0.42 OZ (12g)
Badges printed on packTHIRD PARTY TESTED, GLUTEN FREE, NON-GMO

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories40 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Saturated Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Trans Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Cholesterol0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate9 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars6 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Includes Added Sugars6 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D0 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iron0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin A300 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Thiamin0.15 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Niacin2 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Pantothenic Acid0.6 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Chromium4.8 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Calcium100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C120 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Riboflavin0.17 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B62 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium40 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“ELECTROLYTE BALANCE” · “OPTIMAL HYDRATION” · “SUPPORTS RECOVERY” · “15 ON-THE-GO STICKS” · “FRUIT PUNCH” · “NATURAL & ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS” · “4 KEY ELECTROLYTES” · “B VITAMINS”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$20.95 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Official brand domain: www.advocare.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

IronNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)

Vitamin ANIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,699) · UL 3000 mcg (preformed vitamin A (retinol); excludes beta-carotene)

ThiaminNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,262) · no UL established

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

Pantothenic AcidNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (601) · no UL established

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

RiboflavinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,172) · no UL established

Vitamin B6NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 617459000095 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai