Barcode confirmed in an outside database
UPCitemdb resolves 665355063867 to "Ashwagandha 5000mg Maca Root 2000mg Fenugreek 3000mg Supplement with Tongkat Ali" (Clean Nutraceuticals) — consistent with this listing.
Full record · 665355063867 · back to the summary
Clean Nutraceuticals Ashwagandha Maca Root Fenugreek Supplement with Tongkat Ali Ginseng
Exact product checkedGTIN 00665355063867 · checked 2026-07-21
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
0listed rows
0separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 0 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ashwagandha (10:1 Extract) | — | — | |
| Black Maca | — | — | |
| Yellow Ma | — | — | |
| Red Maca | — | — | |
| Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) (10:1 Extract) | — | — | |
| Trifibranol100X™ Blend | — | — | |
| Tribulus Terrestris (Epimedium sagittatum var. songyangensis) (Fruit) | — | — | |
| Ginkgo Biloba | — | — | |
| Longjack [Root] Powder | — | — | |
| Tribulus Terrestris | — | — | |
| (Epimedium sa | — | — | |
| longifolia) (Roc | — | — | |
| Ginkgo Biloba | — | — | |
| olacoides] (Bark | — | — | |
| Powder, Black | — | — | |
| Quai (Angelica | — | — | |
| [Root] Powder | — | — | |
| Black Pepper | — | — | |
| Black Pepper | — | — | |
| Ag | — | — | |
| Ma | — | — | |
| Fg | — | — | |
| Gg | — | — | |
| Hg | — | — | |
| Ta | — | — | |
| Tb | — | — |
Integrity tells · quoted observations
“Ginkgo Biloba appears more than once”“Black Pepper appears more than once”
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out1
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution3
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The label shows a visible consistency problem
The label visibly shows: “Ginkgo Biloba appears more than once”; “Black Pepper appears more than once”. This is a specific printing or product-image inconsistency worth checking on the package.
Reviews arrived in a burst, not gradually
The dated series runs from 733 written reviews on August 5, 2025 to 822 on August 28, 2026. Up to 817 written reviews were added within a single ~30-day window — 99% of the total. Sudden bursts are the usual fingerprint of incentivized or bought reviews; a steady climb is not.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing7
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: ALLSEASON ENTERPRISES LLC, ALLSEASON IPCO, LLC. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how ashwagandha, tongkat ali, fenugreek, maca root have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 729 on 2025-07-29 to 822 on 2026-08-28 (net +93). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
4
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 665355063867.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Third-Party Tested…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP CERTIFIED…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…MADE IN USA…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…Advanced Ashwagandha Supplements for Mood Support - Our Ashwagandha Root Capsules contain 17 powerful ingredients such as Black Maca Root Powder, Red Maca Root Powder, Y” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| ashwagandha | Studies typically use 250 mg–600 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
| tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia) | Studies typically use 200 mg–400 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
| fenugreek | Studies typically use 500 mg–600 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
| maca root | Studies typically use 1.5 g–3 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
- fenugreek — studied as a standardized extract over 8–12 weeks; may interact with blood-thinning and blood-sugar medication — documented interaction, not advice
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 665355063867 |
| Brand | Clean Nutraceuticals |
| Source listing identifier | B09ML2VFJK |
| Retailer listing title | Clean Nutraceuticals Ashwagandha Maca Root Fenugreek Supplement with T… show full titleClean Nutraceuticals Ashwagandha Maca Root Fenugreek Supplement with Tongkat Ali Ginseng - Assists with Stress, Mood & Thyroid - Ashwagandha Capsules Fenugreek Caps |
| USPTO brand-owner record | ALLSEASON ENTERPRISES LLC · SOUTH DAKOTA, USA; DELAWARE, USA · registration 7031117 · Ste 214-1619, 401 E 8th St, Sioux Falls, SOUTH DAKOTA 57103, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | ALLSEASON IPCO, LLC · DELAWARE, USA · registration 7942428 · 7582 Las Vegas Blvd. S., #3015, Las Vegas, Nevada 89123, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size 2 capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | *These statements have not been evaluate, MADE IN USA, Non-GMO, GMP CERTIFIED, Third-Party Tested, GMP |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Ashwagandha (10:1 Extract) | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Black Maca | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Yellow Ma | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Red Maca | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) (10:1 Extract) | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Trifibranol100X™ Blend | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Tribulus Terrestris (Epimedium sagittatum var. songyangensis | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Ginkgo Biloba | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Longjack [Root] Powder | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Tribulus Terrestris | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| (Epimedium sa | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| longifolia) (Roc | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Ginkgo Biloba | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| olacoides] (Bark | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Powder, Black | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Quai (Angelica | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| [Root] Powder | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Black Pepper | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Black Pepper | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Ag | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Ma | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Fg | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Gg | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hg | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Ta | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“17-in-1 Supplement” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “Supports Energy & Stamina*” · “Promotes Hormonal Balance*” · “Supports Stress Response*” · “Female & Male Vitality*” · “BACKED BY RESEARCH” · “Ashwagandha Supports Stress Response*”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Listed ingredients (as stated on the listing)
Ashwagandha (as Withania somnifera) [Root] (10:1 Extract) 500mg, Maca Blend 500mg: Black Maca (Lepidium meyenii) [Root] (4:1 Extract), Yellow Maca (Lepidium meyenii) [Root] (4:1 Extract), Red Maca (Lepidium meyenii) [Root] (4:1 Extract), Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-grecum) [Seed] (10:1 Extract) 300 mg (Fruit), Trifibranol100X Blend 100mg: Tribulus Terrestris [Fruit] Powder, Horny Goat Weed (Epimedium sagittatum) Powder, Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia) [Root] Powder, Panax ginseng [Dried Root] Powder, Ginkgo biloba [Leaf] Powder, Long Jack (Eurycoma longifolia) [Root] Powder, L-Arginine, L-Citrulline, Muira Puama (Ptychopetalum olacoides) [Bark] Powder, Chasteberry (Vitex agnus-casstus) [Berry] Powder, Black Cohosh (Cimicifuga racemosa) [Root] Powder, Dong Quai (Angelica senensis) [Root]
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Official brand domain: cleannutra.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Ashwagandha — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
ashwagandha — NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).
tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia) — PubMed search: Eurycoma longifolia randomized trial · NIH NCCIH — Herbs at a glance · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: extract standardization varies widely between products; a raw-powder milligram figure is not comparable to a standardized-extract dose used in studies.
fenugreek — PubMed search: fenugreek extract randomized controlled trial · NIH NCCIH — Fenugreek · ClinicalTrials.gov — 60 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: studied as a standardized extract over 8–12 weeks; may interact with blood-thinning and blood-sugar medication — documented interaction, not advice.
maca root — PubMed search: Lepidium meyenii randomized trial · NIH NCCIH — Maca · ClinicalTrials.gov — 9 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: studied for libido-related endpoints; research generally does not show testosterone changes — the two are often conflated in marketing.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 665355063867 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai